Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Le lever du soleil au Mont St-Michel.JPG

File:Le lever du soleil au Mont St-Michel.JPG, not featured edit

Voting period ends on 14 May 2009 at 18:57:24

Info created by Rectilinium - uploaded by Rectilinium - nominated by Rectilinium -- Rectilinium (talk) 18:57, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rectilinium (talk) 18:57, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality is not top notch... The tree needles are blury for example. Sorry --Berru (talk) 20:24, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Heavy noise near the horizon and the tree is very out of focus. —Notyourbroom (talk) 20:38, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice. Long exposure causing blur because of the wind, but the composition and quality doesn't sweep me off my feet. --Richard Bartz (talk) 23:04, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Info I suppose both pictures are not good enough... anyway, I also upload the second one ;) --Rectilinium (talk) 00:14, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would be more inclined to support a sunset/sunrise with the Mont St-Michel visible. --ianaré (talk) 02:50, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi Ianare. I spent one "day" at Mont-Saint-Michel (arrived late at night, left the next day at 11 am). I actually have pictures of it. But it is not possible to see the sun on these pictures, because therefore I would have been forced to take a boat to get out on the sea to be able to make a picture in the right direction. Of course I can upload these photographs I made (Mont-Saint-Michel in the morning light and Mont-Saint-Michel in the night). But honestly Ive seen better pictures from Mont-Saint-Michel itself on Wikipedia then mine (e.g.: MSM sunset, MSM 2 and others) --Rectilinium (talk) 07:00, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Info @Ianare: I finally uploaded four of my Mont Saint-Michel pictures: At night 1, At night 2, In the morning and last but not least my favorite one a detail of MSM. I actually like these photographs, but I dont think they are good enough for FP. Or what would you say? By the way: could you do me a favour? A bot added a "similar images"-tag. Someone needs to make a copyright-violation-check and remove that tag. Could you do that? --Rectilinium (talk) 07:39, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can nominate the photos for Quality Image to get feedback on them before nominating for FP (for the vast majority of images on FP, meeting QI requirements is necessary). I don't know anything about tags, sorry --ianaré (talk) 14:27, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I didnt know, that it would be better to go for QI first :O... Good to know! Next time I'll nominate pictures for QI before I propose them here. Sorry for that wrong approach. Newbie-mistake... thanks for the info. --Rectilinium (talk) 14:32, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Low quality. —kallerna™ 14:36, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\^talk 11:34, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]