Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lithic core - PRE 2009.0.191.1-IMG 1431-1432-1433-gradient.jpg

File:Lithic core - PRE 2009.0.191.1-IMG 1431-1432-1433-gradient.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2010 at 16:28:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Flint Lithic core. Three views of the same object. Found at Le Grand-Pressigny. Offered by Edouard Harlé to Toulouse museum.

Info created by Rama - uploaded by Rama - nominated by Rama -- Rama (talk) 16:28, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I like this but the background shows strange geometric patterns at full res. Please fix. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 16:53, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Color banding maybe? It seems minimal to me Support --IdLoveOne (talk) 17:55, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - If you blurred the background, that should fix it. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 01:32, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the tip, I've tried to bluring the background. May the version in solid black is better? Rama (talk) 07:38, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment i would support solid black version - gradients can be disturbing if reusing an image (print, presentation, etc.) please consider nominating solid colour/transparency. regards, PETER WEIS TALK 15:56, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Well, what is your own choice as nominator ? I would like to support one of the two, but I don't know where is the nomination...--Jebulon (talk) 17:48, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alt1 edit

Info Replaced File:Lithic core - PRE 2009.0.191.1-IMG 1431-1432-1433-gradient.jpg with File:Lithic core - PRE 2009.0.191.1-IMG 1431-1432-1433-black.jpg as nomination (I hope that this is an OK thing to do). Rama (talk) 17:59, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Jebulon (talk) 21:06, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support solid black background version. i think adding "alt1" or something is more considerate here. the votes for/against the old version are only seen in the context of the updated version - seems rather confusing if not showing both versions. PETER WEIS TALK 22:06, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Like this? Rama (talk) 22:19, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- well the first image should remain the gradient version. otherwise using two pictures would not make much sense. regards, PETER WEIS TALK 22:45, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you, this one is much better. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 16:48, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The white balance on the top one appears different to the other two. --99of9 (talk) 03:15, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 19:54, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support --McIntosh Natura (talk) 21:51, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:58, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]