Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Malojapass Böhringer 2018.jpg

File:Malojapass Böhringer 2018.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2019 at 14:45:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created & uploaded by Böhringer - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 14:45, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 14:45, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I haven't decided how to vote, because being upset is an emotional reaction and arguably a reason to vote for, not against, but that said: This does not look like a natural place at 80 seconds, because the long exposure accentuates the lights on the cars on the road in a very disconcerting way. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:26, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment fun picture :) You have my vote if you upload a full resolution picture, provide a descriptive English description, categorize it well, and remove the chromatic aberrations. --Trougnouf (talk) 16:55, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose in the meantime, also the white balance / saturation should be toned down a bit per Basile (but maybe not as far as the version he posted) --Trougnouf (talk) 13:28, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment very blue and downsized. Charles (talk) 17:48, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose as above. --Charles (talk) 11:50, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support Would be great to remove chromatic aberrations on the left --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 21:54, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per Trougnouf. I really like this idea, but the execution could have been done better. I would suggest using layers.--Peulle (talk) 22:57, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Overprocessed. The temperature is too cold, the snow abnormally blue, and the colors seem oversaturated. If you increase the temperature on Lightroom the aspect of the image becomes immediately more realistic -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Certainly the suggestions here would help, but I'm fine with this as is. Daniel Case (talk) 07:57, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning. -- B2Belgium (talk) 11:41, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 13:12, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile. I find the comparison of his edit vs. this photo very convincing, even if it would make sense to keep a bit of blue cast and not go all the way in that direction. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:01, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:00, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:24, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great picture. White balance seems accurate to me, at least it works very well aesthetically. Resolution could be higher but we've seen smaller pictures pass here. Regarding the CA I think they are small and we have strong mitigating reasons here. --Code (talk) 17:05, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- Sahand Ace 20:46, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Neutral until CA is fixed - at 6 MP several pixels wide is very significant. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:02, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 16:42, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:58, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others and also see my comment on the earlier nomination which is also getting critiqued for strong blue colors. – Lucas ^T 22:19, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:21, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support thank you Tomer T --Böhringer (talk) 22:24, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Biser Todorov (talk) 06:56, 13 January 2019 (UTC) Great picture! Well done[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:37, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice picture. --Tournasol7 (talk) 00:36, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:35, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The slopes of the mountains in the background show clear traces of processing in the form of diffuse double structures. It seems layers aren't congruent. All trees on the left are leaning out. I can not understand the abundance of encouragement. The picture has obvious flaws and can´t be a FP --Milseburg (talk) 14:35, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Trougnouf, King of Hearts, Milseburg. A great picture, no offence! but I don’t understand why don’t you fix the CAs. Especially at the trees at the top left, they are very pronounced. --Aristeas (talk) 12:58, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:33, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Msaynevirta (talk) 17:11, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 7 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:07, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural