Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:NASA's Shuttle Carrier Aircraft 905 (front) and 911 (rear).jpg

File:NASA's Shuttle Carrier Aircraft 905 (front) and 911 (rear).jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Feb 2013 at 16:23:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by NASA/Carla Thomas - uploaded and nominated by Ras67 (talk) 16:23, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support An irretrievable image, both airplanes are retired due to the end of the Shuttle program. -- Ras67 (talk) 16:23, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:39, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Peter23 (talk) 06:21, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There is some mist in the air, which makes the picture appear a bit dull. While this is perfectly normal for aerial photographs, it is not too hard to remove that. --El Grafo (talk) 13:12, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Interesting but not exceptional. The colours are washed out and the backgroung is a bit distracting. Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:26, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There is a higher resolution file in the Dryden Image Gallery that has very low contrast, I used that to create a WB/contrast-corrected version:

Higher resolution, less haze

Less busy background

The original from there would also be an alternative. --Julian H. (talk/files) 14:38, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Imo, your version is much better mist-wise, but the blue stripes on the fuselages seem to be a bit dark now. Also, it seems to be a bit too brown/yellow-ish (have a look at the lower side of the fuselages: I guess they should be in a neutral grey? They have a slight color cast in the original too, but it has become stronger through the modifications). But maybe that's just my eyes/monitor tricking me. In terms of the background, I think I prefer the first option. I can't decide which one is the best one overall, so I'll simply Abstain . --El Grafo (talk) 09:26, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  I tried to correct the issues you mentioned, to some extend. --Julian H. (talk/files) 09:45, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:02, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]