Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pancuran Tujuh, near Baturraden, Purwokerto 2015-03-23 03.jpg

File:Pancuran Tujuh, near Baturraden, Purwokerto 2015-03-23 03.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2015 at 04:57:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info All by Crisco 1492. Pancuran Tujuh is a sulphur spring in Baturraden District, Purwokerto. This panoramic image is from 40 frames and shows it (and the... erm, "uniquely" shaped outlets) in great detail. Note that the name means "Seven Springs", and all seven outlets are visible -- — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:57, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:57, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak~~ Support It's good. ~~But one small comment: The cup at the right is a little bit disturbing.~~--XRay ^talk 13:54, 27 March 2015 (UTC) -- OK now. --XRay ^talk 05:38, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- D'oh! That's the thing I hate about Indonesia sometimes; the "nature" tourism is rarely natural. ~~I'll see if I can clone it out.~~ — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:36, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:16, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Plenty wow and well done with good detail. I would recommend removing the cup with Photoshop, though. -- Colin (talk) 20:20, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Crisco, there's a white drinking straw in the middle at the bottom -- it isn't very troubling but if you are editing anyway, it should be easy to clone out. I've added a note about an area I'm concerned is a stitching transition rather than the edge of steam. Can you check your source images to confirm if this area is authentic or the result of stitching. If it is a curved stitch edge, perhaps you can re-do the join with layers in photoshop, or use masks in PtGui to favour the clear frame over the steamy one? -- Colin (talk) 10:53, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - You're right. Doing now. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:05, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Done. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:25, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
What causes the vagueness/mistlike area just above the yellow parts in the leafs? Is this mist, and thus unpreventable? Mvg, Basvb (talk) 22:07, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- These are sulfur hot springs. That's steam. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:23, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great. Yann (talk) 22:44, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Lacks wow for me. Feels like an average travel snap, dull lighting, distracting building in the background that doesn't really compliment the main subject.--Fotoriety (talk) 23:35, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- An average travel snap which is 69.8 megapixels in size and sharp all the way through? If that's average, I want your camera. (Also, the building leads to a cave which is believed to have been the place where the spring's discoverer lived while treating himself in the waters; it's a monument to the discoverer and an intrinsic part of the site. Further details are in the English Wikipedia) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:50, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - By "average travel snap" i am referring to the composition and lighting and atmosphere of the photo. It should be obvious i am not referring to the file size. Besides, large sizes and sharpness could also well mean that it is a QI - FP require more than that.--Fotoriety (talk) 08:43, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    - You didn't specify composition, however. Simply saying "average travel snap" can also imply the equipment and methodology were lacking (pocket camera, no tripod, no stitching in PTGui, no post-processing). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:14, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      - Now you're just being unnecessarily picky and confrontational: "average travel snap" and "distracting building in the background" can both refer to composition...but if you want to make a scene...--Fotoriety (talk) 00:28, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
        I was simply saying that your term "average travel snap" was not inherently about composition (though your examples were), and thus it was unclear to me whether you intended this to refer solely to the composition, or whether there were technical issues that I'd missed (lack of perspective correction, color discrepancies, CA, etc., all of which are also common in "travel snaps"). That's not being "unnecessarily picky" or "making a scene", but "seeking clarification to improve one's work". We are, after all, all working together to provide good quality free imagery, and I'm always looking for ways to improve my contributions. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:59, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
        Your desire to improve your photography is commendable.--Fotoriety (talk) 03:40, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment XRay, Colin: Cup is gone. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:09, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer 05:39, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 07:18, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
And if possible, so add please a geo-tag too. Thanks, Alchemist-hp (talk) 11:17, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:34, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:32, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Baresi F (talk) 14:16, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 15:47, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 06:56, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing outstanding and featurable for me.--Hubertl (talk) 09:36, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with previous opposers, ugly composition. Btw relevant overexposed parts --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 19:00, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Christian Ferrer 18:05, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas