Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panthera pardus close up.jpg

File:Panthera pardus close up.jpg, featured edit

Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2009 at 13:20:05

Info The image features a Panthera pardus with a very high quality. Very sharp image, the warm colors contrast to the actual nature of the beast. Very good depth of field with clear and sharp distinction between the foreground and background. I don't think we have such a good picture of a Tiger on Commons. created by tropicaLiving - uploaded , nominated by Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 13:20, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 13:20, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mtaylor848 (talk) 15:55, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ka ʁs tn 18:12, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Composition. --Karel (talk) 20:48, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support, the composition makes the picture. --Aqwis (talk) 21:05, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Simpledot (talk) 23:29, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Aqwis. →Diti the penguin — 23:40, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Words in sanskrit (talk) 00:54, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Durova (talk) 01:01, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Brackenheim (talk) 04:22, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too tight crop on bottom right. —kallerna™ 16:41, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Here kitty kitty kitty! Daniel Case (talk) 02:35, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support i agree —kallerna, but overall very good --George Chernilevsky (talk) 10:27, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - per kallerna -- Pro2 (talk) 11:30, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ Reasonable quality for a zoo shot, but unfortunate crop of the paws. Lycaon (talk) 15:09, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please add information on the zoo to the description. Lycaon (talk) 15:13, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

done.--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 15:43, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Lycaon (talk) 16:27, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support Crop could be less tight, but pic is good nevertheless--Tired time (talk) 10:20, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Agree that it would be improved by showing more of the paw in the corner, but the animal has so strong a presence that I support it anyway. Fg2 (talk) 12:50, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. --Calibas (talk) 13:32, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Crop.--Mbz1 (talk) 16:11, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose In general, only very few zoo images deserve the status of FP, imho. I don't find this breath taking. Samulili (talk) 21:03, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Avala (talk) 18:49, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose unfortunate crop --ianaré (talk) 23:04, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose (weak) for his legs. --Estrilda (talk) 05:50, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perhaps I am more tolerant of cropping than the voters above me, but it does not seem to affect the composition in any major way. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 15:02, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too tight crop --Chrumps (talk) 21:59, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I updated the image with a wider crop. Tell me what you think.

Support This is better, I don't understand why you submitted the cropped version in the first place though? Lycaon (talk) 08:44, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Curnen (talk) 11:39, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Image updates should be uploaded as seperate images and displayed separately on this page. This adds confusion. I support this version though. --Tom dl (talk) 11:53, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Kanonkas // talk // CCD // 13:54, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support full version. Downtowngal (talk) 18:49, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

result: 21 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\^talk 20:22, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]