Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pillars of Creation (NIRCam Image).jpg

File:Pillars of Creation (NIRCam Image).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2022 at 21:59:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy
Info created by NASA, ESA, CSA, STScI (SCIENCE) and Joseph DePasquale (STScI), Anton M. Koekemoer (STScI), Alyssa Pagan (STScI) (IMAGE PROCESSING) - uploaded and nominated by Habitator terrae -- Habitator terrae 🌍 21:59, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Habitator terrae 🌍 21:59, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I find there are several duplicates of this image on Commons, might needs integration. --Tiouraren (talk) 03:11, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Two .png and one .tif. The proposed image seems to me the only exiting .jpg version, which is needed because of the better rendering of .jpg by Wikimedia. Habitator terrae 🌍 09:58, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A praying mantis in space? Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:08, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:59, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support another one of my favourite pics as an astronomy buff. Everything is just perfect. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:09, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Although I wouldn't be against a set with the tiff (so that browsing to its page shows the FP label too). The tiff could probably be seen as more accurate data (which I guess is ultimately what astronomer use it for) while JPEG is easier to display while browsing. What an incredible shot! - Benh (talk) 11:13, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Actually (as far as out of interest I have taken a look at the raw data) the merged tiff-image isn't the data used by astronomers. They use different layers in different files of the intensity of the different "invisible" infared red colors, here shown with different visible colors. Habitator terrae 🌍 19:02, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 12:07, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 14:48, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Dinkum (talk) 17:54, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:14, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:56, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:19, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:53, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:32, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:37, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald 17:58, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Simply great! I was stunned when the 1995 photo of this nebula came to my vision, this is even more stunning and JWST has a bright future ahead! --Granada (talk) 19:39, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Nythar^T^.^C 05:33, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Micha (talk) 10:38, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:11, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:56, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 20:49, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:28, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:55, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 17:09, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:20, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Astronomy