Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pine trees growing on the slope of Cinder Cone.jpg

File:Pine trees growing on the slope of Cinder Cone.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2020 at 02:21:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United States#California
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:21, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:21, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support outstanding! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:28, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 08:06, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:07, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 08:45, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Related anecdote: In the back of my head is a painting of a similar motif, probably now in Tate, MoMA or some such place. I did a Google picture search to see if I could locate it. No such luck. The system identified this as "grass" and promptly redirected me to Günter Grass. Probably the most worthless search I've ever done. Still, it looks like a painting in a national art gallery. --Cart (talk) 09:04, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:34, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent minimalist design -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:06, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:43, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 13:33, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:38, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent quality. Cmao20 (talk) 14:46, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:54, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Outstanding minimalism --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:07, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- B2Belgium (talk) 20:51, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poetic. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:45, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pudelek (talk) 09:39, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Although I agree with the others in terms of quality and wow factor, the categories need species ID for me to support this.--Peulle (talk) 11:30, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 13:12, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is an abstract image, not a species identification photo; no one would ever use this picture to illustrate an article on the species. So I don't view ID as a requirement (but if you can, it would of course be even better). -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:24, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 19:59, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --DXR (talk) 22:14, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 00:28, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:55, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:43, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I thought at first it was some weeds Cart had found growing in a parking lot somewhere (which I would have supported just as readily). Daniel Case (talk) 06:03, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel: LOL!

Great minds... I actually have a couple of dandelions in a parking lot about to get edited and uploaded. They won't make FPC though. --Cart (talk) 09:30, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:40, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 25 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 10:50, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/United States#California