Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Porsche 356 A Speedster 1600 Super, Bj. 1956, Heck (2016-07-02 Sp).jpg

File:Porsche 356 A Speedster 1600 Super, Bj. 1956, Heck (2016-07-02 Sp).jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jul 2016 at 14:19:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles
Info created and uploaded by Spurzem - nominated by User:Spurzem
Neutral -- Spurzem (talk) 14:19, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice car--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:30, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good car shot, but doesn't wow me. INeverCry 21:51, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's a very convincing argument. ;-) I never heard a better one. -- Spurzem (talk) 22:45, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jetzt komm, Lothar, so neu bist du hier nicht. Man braucht sein Kontra hier sogar überhaupt nicht zu begründen, und wenn man es dennoch tut, ist es ein Hinweis an den Autor bzw. Nominator, was dem Bild fehlt. Und ja, „no wow“ ist ausreichend für eine Ablehnung auf FPC, denn ein FP braucht „wow“ (kannst du in den Guidelines nachlesen). Bitte reagier auf Ablehnung nicht immer gleich so angepisst. Nicht jeder hat deinen Geschmack, und um als Fotograf erfolgreich zu sein, sollte man den Geschmack seines Publikums studieren und berücksichtigen (außer man ist richtig verdammt gut, und so richtig verdammt gut bist du nicht). Die Gelegenheit hast du hier kostenlos. Wenn du das lieber als persönliche Beleidigung auffaßt, ist es allein dein Problem. Issochwahr. --Kreuz schnabel 21:03, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Sorry, no doubt a good quality car shot (and car!) but the location is a bit busy and the light a little bland, hence no wow for me either. Perhaps there is a better place down the road to shoot it. w.carter-Talk 22:59, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I seriously considered a supporting vote, but I find the light a bit dull. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:57, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ikan, just a QI of a classic car. Daniel Case (talk) 00:18, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It is really a good image but the pavement is too dominant. I think a crop of the bottom will improve it, crop of all is under the edge of the bottom right of the sidewalk. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 06:25, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination O.K. – I withdraw. Now I know that buildings with distorted walls and towers are FP but cars with flowers in the background are no wow. -- Spurzem (talk) 10:21, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please don't take it badly. Most of us have faced a barrage of "oppose" here even when we thought we had the perfect image but also been surprised when we though no one would vote for an image and it got promoted. Please try again with another pic. w.carter-Talk 13:46, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:00, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]