Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rally Finland 2010 - shakedown - Dani Sordo 2.jpg

File:Rally Finland 2010 - shakedown - Dani Sordo 2.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2011 at 14:04:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by kallerna —kallerna™ 14:04, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another photo from Rally Finland 2010: see what the 4WD WRC -cars have done to the road. —kallerna™ 14:04, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The background is too distracting and the angle isn't ideal. File:Rally Finland 2010 - shakedown - Dani Sordo 3.jpg is better but I wouldn't recommend nominating it either. Royalbroil 01:23, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The background is IMO just perfect: sunny forest and field (sidenotice: the day was the hottest ever measured in Finland) + typical rallyspectators = iconic setting for Rally Finland. The angle is the same in other photo, and only because of the angle the worn out road can be seen. —kallerna™ 10:55, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The composition is certainly better in the nominated image than the suggested alternative, given a more practical crop and implementation of lead room/rule of thirds. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 11:49, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Royalbroil. Also, we allready have a FP from this event (File:Rally Finland 2010 - shakedown - Jari-Matti Latvala 3.jpg), so it´s only fair that any other FP nomination fill the same quality standards.--Snaevar (talk) 23:18, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support I still don't feel that these types of photos showoff the cars best, but it is good. --IdLoveOne (talk) 03:20, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - While the composition is superior IMO to the suggested alternative, I still feel it's rather awkward and underwhelming. The bar has been set high. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 21:01, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The bar? We have only 4 rally FP's (2 from the same event + File:Andreas Waldherr Lavanttal Rallye 2009 2.jpg and File:Peugeot 206 WRC.jpg, which is rather small). Do all car FP's have to be panningshots or of historic cars? —kallerna™ 13:44, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Four is by no means a small amount. I don't subscribe to the argument that the number of existing FPs on a particular topic precludes others from being promoted, but I feel the existing FPs in this case superior. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 14:08, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - little illustrative value. --Спас Колев (talk) 15:08, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --shizhao (talk) 08:50, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:06, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]