Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Reconciliation by Vasconcellos, Coventry.jpg

File:Reconciliation by Vasconcellos, Coventry.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2016 at 07:42:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info created by Martinvl - uploaded by Martinvl - nominated by Martinvl -- Martinvl (talk) 07:42, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Martinvl (talk) 07:42, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I am not ready to vote on whether to feature this picture. I'd make two observations: (1) It's a well-taken picture. (2) It's small and probably will be judged too small. Most FPs are at least 6 MP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:13, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Question There is no FOP tag on this one. Do we know what its copyright status is? I believe that it might be OK, having taken pictures of potentially covered subjects in the UK myself and uploaded them here, but I will not !vote (and would advise anyone else not to) until we know whether this is definitely a free image. Daniel Case (talk) 17:05, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've answered my own question. It's OK. However, I ...

... Oppose as the background is too complex, diluting the image of the sculpture and distracting from it. Daniel Case (talk) 17:08, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Daniel. I love the sculpture though, and this deserves the QI/VI status it has. INeverCry 19:06, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - As I said, it's a well-taken photo. As for the background: (a) I like it in the picture, compositionally; it's a beautiful background, cropped so as to make a nice frame, and the sculpture fits into the view. (b) That's what the background is. (c) It gives an appropriate sense of place to a photo from Coventry. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:47, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:00, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]