Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Regal Sea Goddess Nudibranch.jpg

File:Regal Sea Goddess Nudibranch.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2013 at 18:37:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A tourist snapshot does 7Mo (4 824 × 3 138 pixels) ? Maybe reducing the size, the quality will be better !––Citron (talk) 10:50, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Megapixels don't correlate with camera quality, camera price, image quality or photographer abilities. The image is blurry even in the 1024 pixel wide preview. If this is a rare animal, it might still be a valuable photo, but not a featureable one imo. --Julian H. (talk/files) 13:43, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I find it a bit hard, it's an underwater picture. Look this one, isn't less blurry that our picture, just look at the file size.--Citron (talk) 16:28, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That one was apparently not properly checked by enough reviewers. Time for a delist?  B.p. 16:50, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This is an example among others, you can delist all ours underwater pictures, if you want.--Citron (talk) 18:22, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
As marine biologist, I certainly don't want to.  B.p. 18:49, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Quality is a bit low (even after downsizing) compared to another Nudibranch we have; but acceptable IMHO. JKadavoor Jee 03:12, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:09, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals