Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Regal Sea Goddess Nudibranch.jpg
File:Regal Sea Goddess Nudibranch.jpg, featured edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2013 at 18:37:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by NOAA - uploaded by Totodu74 - nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 18:37, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
- Support -- Citron (talk) 18:37, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful capture, sharpness OK for underwater. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:30, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 00:02, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Ritchyblack (talk) 05:49, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
- Support. This is listed at Nudibranch as Hypselodoris edenticulata. It will be nice if added it to the file description, if that ID is correct. JKadavoor Jee 08:07, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks Citron for the ID update. I still can see many subspecies looks very different. So raised a request at WikiProject Gastropods. JKadavoor Jee 06:22, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
- Invertzoo confirmed the ID. (So a file rename may good.) The other file seems to have a better AOV; but I like this too. JKadavoor Jee 15:43, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
- Support Good underwater quality -- Arcalino (talk) 09:00, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Very good picture, but the caption is a bit low. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:55, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 07:06, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Very poor quality underwater image. B.p. 19:28, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Per B.p. Good composition, but the quality is nothing more than a tourist snapshot. The wide support is a puzzle. --A.Savin 10:26, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
- A tourist snapshot does 7Mo (4 824 × 3 138 pixels) ? Maybe reducing the size, the quality will be better !––Citron (talk) 10:50, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
- Megapixels don't correlate with camera quality, camera price, image quality or photographer abilities. The image is blurry even in the 1024 pixel wide preview. If this is a rare animal, it might still be a valuable photo, but not a featureable one imo. --Julian H. (talk/files) 13:43, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
- I find it a bit hard, it's an underwater picture. Look this one, isn't less blurry that our picture, just look at the file size.--Citron (talk) 16:28, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
- That one was apparently not properly checked by enough reviewers. Time for a delist? B.p. 16:50, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
- This is an example among others, you can delist all ours underwater pictures, if you want.--Citron (talk) 18:22, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
- As marine biologist, I certainly don't want to. B.p. 18:49, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
- Quality is a bit low (even after downsizing) compared to another Nudibranch we have; but acceptable IMHO. JKadavoor Jee 03:12, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
- As marine biologist, I certainly don't want to. B.p. 18:49, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
- This is an example among others, you can delist all ours underwater pictures, if you want.--Citron (talk) 18:22, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
- That one was apparently not properly checked by enough reviewers. Time for a delist? B.p. 16:50, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
- I find it a bit hard, it's an underwater picture. Look this one, isn't less blurry that our picture, just look at the file size.--Citron (talk) 16:28, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
- Megapixels don't correlate with camera quality, camera price, image quality or photographer abilities. The image is blurry even in the 1024 pixel wide preview. If this is a rare animal, it might still be a valuable photo, but not a featureable one imo. --Julian H. (talk/files) 13:43, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
Oppose per above.--Julian H. (talk/files) 13:43, 16 March 2013 (UTC)- Changing to Neutral, it's seems to be very hard to get things in focus underwater. --Julian H. (talk/files) 08:51, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
- Info a new version is uploaded: CA removed and a bit highpass sharpened. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:59, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
- Comment BTW, the name is wrong too. This is Felimare picta (Schultz in Philippi, 1836). (ref.: Johnson R.F. & Gosliner T.M. (2012) Traditional taxonomic groupings mask evolutionary history: A molecular phylogeny and new classification of the chromodorid nudibranchs. PLoS ONE 7(4):e33479.) B.p. 15:05, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
- Question do you mean the file name? The image description says: "Felimare picta at Gray's Reef National Marine Sanctuary, Savannah, Georgia." Otherwise it is simple to rename this image. Your proposal? --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:13, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
- No I was too fast. I was referring to the Hypselodoris name above. A file rename after processing FPC will do fine. Thanks for notifying me. B.p. 15:22, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:09, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals