Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Reichstagsufer, Berlin-Mitte, 360x180, 160401, ako.jpg

File:Reichstagsufer, Berlin-Mitte, 360x180, 160401, ako.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2016 at 05:34:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
Info Spherical panorama of Reichstagsufer, Berlin-Mitte. Please check it in the 360° viewer before voting. Thank you! All by me. -- Code (talk) 05:34, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Code (talk) 05:34, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Not perfect - the darkest part of the sky looks pixellated - but brilliant! How do you manage to get trailless stars and photograph everything that's so much lighter clearly? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:38, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thank you for you comment, Ikan. I don't know exactly what you mean by saying "pixellated" but it's always difficult to apply the right amount of noise reduction. For this kind of pictures I usually use the Samyang 14mm lens. At this focal length you can use a longer exposure time without getting star trails. Of course I do some retouching, too. --Code (talk) 05:43, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - What I mean by "pixellated" is that the darkest sections directly overhead have angular shapes that don't look real to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:03, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment That's probably because these parts have been stretched by the panorama stitching software in order to create the equirectangular (360x180) picture. --Code (talk) 06:10, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support Think you could get the same at dusk? - Benh (talk) 08:45, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Really a joy to browse. Thanks for sharing this! - Benh (talk) 08:53, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Benh. I tried to take the same picture somewhat earlier but the place was very crowdy then. At the moment a daily light show takes place there every evening until october, 3rd so until then no second try will be possible. But anyways it's a great place to take photographs and I'm going there from time to time. --Code (talk) 06:47, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support INeverCry 19:06, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:13, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:14, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support I am thinking of adding this pic to the Category:Surrealism. w.carter-Talk 20:48, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mö1997 (Questions ?!?!) 21:13, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent work --The Photographer (talk) 01:12, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 07:34, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:55, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support − Meiræ 11:15, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- KTC (talk) 20:29, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ali Zifan 21:24, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 20:56, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:19, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes