Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rosa canina Neulengbach 20160611 01.jpg

File:Rosa canina Neulengbach 20160611 01.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2016 at 10:36:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Rosaceae
Info Close-up of Dog-rose (Rosa canina). All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:36, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:36, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I would question the depth of field because while the center of the flower is beautifully in focus, none of the petals are, but you describe this accurately as a closeup. So take this for whatever it's worth, but I would suggest cropping almost all the leaves from the photo and having the picture frame be only big enough to encompass the flower well (probably in a square frame). If you do that, I would probably support featuring the picture because the part that is in focus is a great closeup! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:47, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support more DOF under natural conditions is almost impossible for a small subject like this, focus bracketing is not possible. therefore I support this nomination. --Hubertl 01:56, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support nicely done! Atsme 📞 03:01, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Love the DOF. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:53, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:24, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The image is of excellent quality, but the light conditions seem somewhat harsh to me. So I feel no wow. Kruusamägi (talk) 20:20, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Isasza (talk) 17:31, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support INeverCry 04:35, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 07:35, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too darky shades in the upper half region of the photo --Zcebeci (talk) 23:31, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support PLeasing composition offsets the inevitable DoF problems. Daniel Case (talk) 13:37, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose very good quality but the light (dark background, flower a bit shadowed) make it not enough outstanding Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:04, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Christian Ferrer (shadows) and also petals edges blurred, sorry -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:32, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:07, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 01:00, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]