Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:San Martino ai Monti (Rome) - Interior.jpg

File:San Martino ai Monti (Rome) - Interior.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 May 2016 at 13:48:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
I withdraw my nomination All by LivioAndronico ^(talk) 13:48, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LivioAndronico ^(talk) 13:48, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Glare from the very distracting lights. The horizontals on the facing wall aren't horizontal in the photo, suggesting you weren't quite perpendicular to the wall, which is expected for architectural photos. The lighting isn't the best with patches of dark poorly lit and patches of overly-bright. -- Colin (talk) 17:02, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ - I have to agree with Colin, but if you use the suggested crop, I'd certainly be willing to give the photo another look. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:17, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done thanks --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 11:23, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Did you lighten shadows and darken highligths in RAW ? --Mile (talk) 12:19, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I'm now Neutral. I don't think this is one of your really great photos, partly because there's less scope for my eyes to move around the picture frame, and I'm not sure whether or not it's featurable. The interior is certainly pretty, but for example the blown areas on the sides still bother me. So I may reconsider, but right now, neither support nor opposition from me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:42, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Mild Oppose per Colin & Ikan. INeverCry 19:08, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Tilted; if corrected I'd take a stronger look. Daniel Case (talk) 04:41, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 07:20, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:04, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]