Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sant'Antonio da Padova all'Esquilino - Interior.jpg

File:Sant'Antonio da Padova all'Esquilino - Interior.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2016 at 22:31:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Info All by LivioAndronico ^(talk) 22:31, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LivioAndronico ^(talk) 22:31, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Dusk image. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 23:05, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment what you mean for "dusk image"?--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 23:22, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support I like the muted light. The mural at the back looks properly lit. INeverCry 01:03, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I actually find that fresco a bit too bright, particularly at full size, but overall, the room looks quite good and I think this is a successful picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:34, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:50, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm not convinced by the composition. There's too much floor and not enough space at the top. Then the benches in the foreground are too dark, they look nearly black. I also notice some pincushion distortion. The floor doesn't look straight but is leaning out on both sides (and so does the top part of the picture). A good QI but not one of our finest church interiors, I think. --Code (talk) 08:10, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, I have to agree with Code, especially about the composition. I need more "up" and less "down".--Jebulon (talk) 17:49, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done for the distortions,however this church is famous for the ground and more the up is only white....thanks --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:25, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support good true light, nice true view! I'm feeling the interior from the church. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:51, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:37, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 23:22, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support A little dim but that in this case means that everything appears more realistic, with minimal post-processing visible. Daniel Case (talk) 03:32, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 06:49, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's good, but I'm not convinced it's one the finest church interior images we have. Kruusamägi (talk) 08:33, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose very distorted image, especially at the right side. The altar is not sharp, and weird shadows are present. Capture One is the best fixer for that. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton 14:48, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what picture you see --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 17:46, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Benzol (talk) 09:43, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. Little wow. - Benh (talk) 08:29, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:22, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]