Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Scottish Fold cat (blue).jpg
File:Scottish Fold cat (blue).jpg, not featured edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2010 at 11:15:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info Scottish Fold cat, usually used as a domestic animal. Created by Peter Perepelkin - uploaded by Peter Perepelkin - nominated by Peter Perepelkin -- Peter Perepelkin (talk) 11:15, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support -- Peter Perepelkin (talk) 11:15, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose white balance --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 11:32, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, of too much blue --Jonathunder (talk) 12:39, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support "Too much blue" doesn't seem like a legitimate reason for FPX to me. It looks like a blue variety (maybe a little w:British Shorthair mixed in) taken near a window, at worst there might've been some camera problems. --IdLoveOne (talk) 15:28, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - before MPF corrected the color balance, the entire image was unnaturally blue. Jonathunder (talk) 15:47, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oh I see, but GIMP's white balance shows a bit more blue than the current version. --IdLoveOne (talk) 16:10, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- I don't claim my colour edit is perfect (purr-fect, with a cat involved?), if you can do better, please do - MPF (talk) 16:31, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- No, I like your version better than GIMP's. --IdLoveOne (talk) 16:59, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- I don't claim my colour edit is perfect (purr-fect, with a cat involved?), if you can do better, please do - MPF (talk) 16:31, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oh I see, but GIMP's white balance shows a bit more blue than the current version. --IdLoveOne (talk) 16:10, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - before MPF corrected the color balance, the entire image was unnaturally blue. Jonathunder (talk) 15:47, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support "Too much blue" doesn't seem like a legitimate reason for FPX to me. It looks like a blue variety (maybe a little w:British Shorthair mixed in) taken near a window, at worst there might've been some camera problems. --IdLoveOne (talk) 15:28, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Colour balance corrected - MPF (talk) 12:56, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - poor depth of focus, with nose and eyebrows blurred, and bad glare at rim of head - MPF (talk) 12:56, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Ghabara (talk) 17:03, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Poor image quality -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:14, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Halcyon (talk) 16:35, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Sockpuppet! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:26, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Major lighting problems. Steven Walling 17:26, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mojado (talk • contribs)
- Sockpuppet! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:26, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose poor cropping -- Laitr Keiows (talk) 05:57, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose poor quality --Berthold Werner (talk) 08:33, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose poor quality and depth of field Cathy Richards (talk) 16:29, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 12:25, 4 October 2010 (UTC)