Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Seven Sisters Panorama, East Sussex, England - May 2009.jpg

File:Seven Sisters Panorama, East Sussex, England - May 2009.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2014 at 16:53:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created and uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Arion -- ArionEstar (talk) 16:53, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ArionEstar (talk) 16:53, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:53, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Alternating unsharp and sharp zones are irritating (I added an annotation about an unsharp one – the parts right of it are definitely much sharper). Maybe fixable by re-stitching after masking the unsharp areas (provided that the source images overlap wide enough). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kreuzschnabel (talk • contribs) 00:35, 6 November 2014 UTC (UTC)
- To be honest, I don't even see it. Maybe it's there, but it must be very subtle. Given the overall sharpness (even the least sharp areas are probably sharper than most images nominated here) and high resolution, I don't think it's really cause for opposition. Diliff (talk) 06:35, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Actually I see it now, but I still think it's quite insignificant. I guess it was maybe because I had not locked the focus and each frame had a slightly different focus distance. Diliff (talk) 06:37, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    - The unsharp bit is no less sharp than many FPs. Consider that to see the unsharpness at 100% on a typical desktop monitor, you are looking at a poster 2.2m wide from 30cm away (that's 7.4 feet wide from 1 foot). -- Colin (talk) 15:56, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Diliff (talk) 06:35, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Hubertl (talk) 12:29, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 15:56, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:03, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer ^{Talk / Im. / Fav.} 07:13, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 15:18, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 20:15, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Cayambe (talk) 22:45, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Agree with Colin about the (slightly) unsharp zone. Overexposed areas are insignificant. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:39, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support The sharp/unsharp issue is insignficant. -- Ram-Man 02:45, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gra phi um 10:27, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Slightly tilted (see sea horizon)--Jebulon (talk) 11:21, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 18:53, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas