Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:St-Laurent-de-Belzagot 16 Paysage avec étang 2013.jpg

File:St-Laurent-de-Belzagot 16 Paysage avec étang 2013.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Feb 2016 at 20:26:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info created and uploaded by JLPC - nominated by Σπάρτακος -- Σπάρτακος (talk) 20:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Σπάρτακος (talk) 20:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - The picture is sharp and the countryside is pleasant, but I question the composition. For example, I don't like the way the road at the extreme right is cut off - it seems random to me. There might be a way to get a fine composition out of this with some other crop, but I'll leave that to you. As it is, I don't feel that it's an outstanding work that I can support featuring. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The "wow" on this is borderline for me, and if it were one of those super detailed panoramas I would be OK with it, but there is visible unsharpness at 100% on a 20 MP image. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj (talk) 21:37, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ikan; I don't find the composition stimulating enough. It feels like one of those pictures that felt awesome when you took it but, when you look at later, is more like "oh". I guess the horizon line is too close to flat for me. Daniel Case (talk) 04:49, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I think it's really a nice picture and has high quality but it's somehow not extraordinary enough to become FP, I'm afraid. --Code (talk) 06:09, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ikan & KoH. INeverCry 03:23, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is one of those pics that soothes the hear. Perhaps the various greens with the blue clear sky. --Caballero//Historiador ^☊ 06:10, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:13, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:53, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]