Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sukkah at Congregation Emanu-El (05326p).jpg

File:Sukkah at Congregation Emanu-El (05326p).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2019 at 03:32:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
Info Today marks the end of Sukkot, for which this grand sukkah was constructed last week in Temple Emanu-El in New York City. It happened to overlap with Open House New York (open doors days), so I was able to take a few pictures this morning. (This image is three stitched together). created/uploaded/nominated by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 03:32, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 03:32, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 06:59, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely, another Jewish religious building from you. Cmao20 (talk) 19:11, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Even more sharpness at full size would be welcome, but I think it's already an FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:45, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hanooz 01:22, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Perspective problem on both sides: the walls don't seem vertical -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:12, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't think it is a good composition. It is taken from very close, and this yields that unnecessary horizontal curvature. Glaring stitching error on the right side, and perspective issue, as per Basile. - Benh (talk) 17:38, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On a second thought, I think this could be converted to rectilinear projection without introducing too much distortion. - Benh (talk) 17:40, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments. I'll open it up later tonight and see what I can fix. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:44, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New version uploaded. I fixed the stitching error and adjusted the perspective. While I was at it, I did a little selective sharpening and brought down the highlights a bit. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:42, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest pinging everyone. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:04, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Andrew J.Kurbiko, Cmao20, Ikan Kekek, Hanooz, Basile Morin, and Benh: Done — Rhododendrites ^talk | 03:12, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Better. But with Benh's comment, I'm intrigued about the curvature of the stairs. They seem naturally rounded on the picture, while they might not be like that in reality -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:52, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:57, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:11, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:18, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 16:07, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp here 04:45, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Booth sift 05:30, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:53, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:27, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings