Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:TawaramotoRiceField.png

File:TawaramotoRiceField.png, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 May 2011 at 03:58:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Kansaikiwi - uploaded by Kansaikiwi - nominated by Kansaikiwi -- Kansaikiwi (talk) 03:58, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kansaikiwi (talk) 03:58, 1 May 2011 (UTC) Account too new --The High Fin Sperm Whale 04:20, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, Most of the image is badly out of focus and no clear subject. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 04:17, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- Firstly, the title and the choice of focus show what the subject is and this is a true support because I find this image interesting. And the people look like ants lol -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 14:32, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment --Did you really look the image at full size? And you're not surprised by the fact only the center of the body is in focus while the head is completely blurred knowing the whole body is in the same focus plane, as well as the fact the bottom of the image is again less blurred? This is not a « choice of focus » but was photoshoped! Pathetic. Sting (talk) 14:24, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well yeah it's pretty clear this has been altered digitally. But I'm not so sure how one could photograph this type of scenery in an interesting way; It's not an object that could be isolated and masked. -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 04:13, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem for me to use a blur mask but in this case it has been made so badly that this photograph lost any value it may had and is unpleasant to look at. Sting (talk) 15:02, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

~~Comment~~ Oppose --lol. Good idea to try highlight the two farmers using a blur mask, but unfortunately not the minimum precaution has been taken during the process. Sting (talk) 13:30, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Defiantly deserving the FPX status. No further explanation needed, IMO.--Snaevar (talk) 21:24, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- You have no explanation? Then elaborate. :) -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 01:34, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Blurred, not in zoom --Kiran Gopi (talk) 07:33, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per FPX. W.S. 01:22, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:52, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]