Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vantaanjoki, 2010 July - Wide 2.JPG

File:Vantaanjoki, 2010 July - Wide 2.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2010 at 11:50:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Ximonic - uploaded by Ximonic - nominated by Ximonic -- Ximonic (talk) 11:50, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ximonic (talk) 11:50, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- Seems oversaturated. Also there is a strange feeling of distortion of the horizontal lines. Is it real? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:41, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Seems oversaturated, harsh contrast, not a bad picture, but not exactly up to FP status, for me. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 14:17, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - needs a location tag - MPF (talk) 18:13, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support FP for me. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:33, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Oversaturated for me. Lycaon (talk) 07:11, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Now there is a version with reduced coloring. --Ximonic (talk) 08:15, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose -- Oversaturated, fisheye distortion. Please open a new subsection for the new version. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:08, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Maurilbert  Richard  [®]  23:14, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I like the composition, but this would would be significantly better if it were taken closer to sunset/sunrise. Jujutacular ^T · C 03:41, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the nominated file due to oversaturation. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:18, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Another version

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2010 at 11:50:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info The another version with decreased colors. --Ximonic (talk) 20:45, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Well, now it looks dull and washed out... I believe the problem to be more fundamental than just a saturation/contrast tweek in Photoshop or GIMP. To but it in non-technical terms I might understand : due to the harsh lighting of the scene, the camera had a hard time rendering subtle hues, and instead produced almost white highlights, almost black shadows, and strongly saturated colors in the greenery. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 23:21, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral -- I think this is a very fine image, though maybe not up to FP standards. I still don't like the fish-eye distortion though. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:09, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:24, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]