Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Veado-campeiro macho no Parque Nacional da Serra da Canastra.jpg

File:Veado-campeiro macho no Parque Nacional da Serra da Canastra.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2016 at 00:20:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Info created and uploaded by Nortondefeis - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:20, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:20, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
still Neutral – looks a bit too reddish for my taste, and unfortunate crop giving more space below than above. Crop suggestion added (to get the animal a bit de-centered as well). --Kreuz schnabel 08:46, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I can accept unsharp background more readily than unsharp foreground, which really looks unnatural to me. I'll be willing to reconsider if you try Kreuzschnabel's suggested crop, which should get rid of a lot of the unsharp foreground, but I don't guarantee I'll support the result. For now, I will Oppose. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:40, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Information to @Kreuzschnabel and Ikan Kekek: Cropped. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:43, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Thanks! Improved IMHO. Not sure it passes FP threshold for me but certainly got closer to it :-) --Kreuzschnabel 17:08, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment - I agree on both counts but don't feel impelled to change my opposition to neutral. I may reconsider later. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:49, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A decent deer shot, but overall too red and the deer looks like it needs to calm down a bit after being startled by the photographer. INeverCry 18:09, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent quality and lovely --The Photographer (talk) 23:00, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I can accept the warmth of the image as likely an effect of shooting at what was probably evening golden hour (I assume this was in South America somewhere, where that time of day would be around sunset at this time of year). But the background is noisier than I would expect for what is clearly not a long exposure, and given that the metadata tells us more about what software was used than the camera used to create the image I am not willing to !vote without knowing more about what details of this image's creation might explain these things. Daniel Case (talk) 06:06, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:07, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:35, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]