Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wall April 2015-1.jpg

File:Wall April 2015-1.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2015 at 22:47:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info Long live minimalism! Detail of a curved wall in the Belém Cultural Centre building, Lisbon. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:47, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:47, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose The upper part of the image is slightly blurred. It's too bad. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 22:58, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm sorry, this doesn't work for me ---Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:35, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I love this struktures more than anything else. It´s a pity, that the upper part is unsharp. --Hubertl 12:46, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Qualified support Given the subject I think I can forgive this degree of unsharpness. Daniel Case (talk) 15:59, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose is the wall distorted or need the image a "pincushion distortion" correction? --Alchemist-hp (talk) 06:53, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

According to the author, the wall is curved. The straight vertical lines indicate there is little geometric distortion. dllu (t,c) 07:33, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I really don't think that a stone wall is a good subject for FP. Also, the sharpness is not good. Brick walls are commonly used to test lens sharpness, and many lens review websites use similar pictures to compare lenses. Most decent prime lenses fare better than this. A tripod and f/8 would be needed for a sharp image from corner to corner, especially as the scene is not planar and this lens seems to suffer from some field curvature. dllu (t,c) 07:33, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Dllu. Nothing extraordinary here. -- Pofka (talk) 12:10, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:13, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:47, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]