Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Winter baby 10-months-old.jpg

File:Winter baby 10-months-old.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 May 2011 at 17:24:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded & nominated by Kozuch -- Kozuch (talk) 17:24, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kozuch (talk) 17:24, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Snaevar 22:50, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tomascastelazo 00:55, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T 11:31, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mbdortmund 13:39, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support nádhera --Slfi 14:27, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very positive ^) --Dmitry Rozhkov (talk) 21:09, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Sorry but I see nothing featurable here, starting with the poor lighting and framing (babies are all beautiful to me though). Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:04, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I dont want to offend you, but I cant really see better lighting or framing in your FP portrait for instance... Cheers, Kozuch (talk) 09:54, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Don't worry, you aren't offending me at all! It looks like the picture was taken in 'contre-jour' (against the light) making the face somber. The ugly highlights are probably caused by a flash. Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:20, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Alves. babies are all beautiful but there is nothing special in this image. ■ MMXX ^talk 08:18, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Alvesgaspar. I don't like the crop. --Citron (talk) 09:56, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Pretty baby for sure, QI for sure, but nothing extraordinary nor rare nor special enough to my taste--Jebulon (talk) 14:54, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Alvesgaspar. Sorry baby!--Claus (talk) 17:06, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Everything has been said.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:10, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bergwolf (talk) 20:18, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- aghith 05:47, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The light looks very strange to me... --BastienM (talk) 06:46, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Alvesgaspar, sorry. --Avenue (talk) 09:07, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:55, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]