Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Yawning cat by David Montolio.jpg

File:Yawning cat by David Montolio.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2016 at 18:18:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Info created by David Montolio - uploaded by Moon rabbit 365 - nominated by Moon rabbit 365 -- Moon rabbit 365 (talk) 18:18, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Moon rabbit 365 (talk) 18:18, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support INeverCry 18:50, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is licensed as pd-mark at Flickr: I thought these were all getting deleted? INeverCry 19:16, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support OK, this is a different type of cat pic, and for that I'll support, although I wish the tips of the ears had been handled better. Daniel Case (talk) 01:19, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Now we are internet!! *_* -- RTA 02:32, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support An excellent snap-shot. ^_^ Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:04, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:29, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:28, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:35, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Eugh. That's not nice, either to look at or technically. The earlier File:Yawning cat portrait (8423278464).jpg was better technically. This is extremely noisy, posterised. There's something like flare over much of the left side of the image and what's with the little triangle on the bottom right? The DoF is poor, and what is in focus isn't really sharp due to the very high ISO. The colour temperature looks off. The whiskers are cropped. Has nobody seen a cat yawn before? This is quite unremarkable and far from FP quality. -- Colin (talk) 13:27, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Horrible. Firebrace (talk) 14:17, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bad quality --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:41, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Colin. BTW, what's the strange element in the lower right corner? --Code (talk) 21:01, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 10:16, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Would be of high EV if sharper and with less noise. --Cayambe (talk) 11:30, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support, I can't judge according to technical details. I like it, that's it. — TintoMeches, 15:02, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:12, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]