Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Yellow-headed caracara (Milvago chimachima) on capybara (Hydrochoeris hydrochaeris).JPG

File:Yellow-headed caracara (Milvago chimachima) on capybara (Hydrochoeris hydrochaeris).JPG, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2015 at 15:04:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Info all by Charlesjsharp -- Charles (talk) 15:04, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charles (talk) 15:04, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very noisy. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 15:26, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The situation is so fun that I have difficulties not to support. But atleast it would need some color denoising. About other noise reducal i'm not sure as some actual details might easily get lost. The regular grain, in this case, might be the lesser evil. --Ximonic (talk) 19:33, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Support Slightly better. --Ximonic (talk) 21:12, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral per Ximonic. Support Acceptable now. Daniel Case (talk) 05:23, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose Nice, but noisy nad IMO too low DoF. The bird isn't sharp. --XRay ^talk 06:45, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support interesting and rare sight --Mile (talk) 19:09, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 20:00, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Mile and excellent light. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:19, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support It wow. The slightly noise in the background is acceptable.--Hubertl 10:58, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose ~~Strong noise on the subject,~~ very dark shadows and clipped highlights. Very cool subject though. — Julian H.^✈ 11:34, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Beautiful image, but for me no FP quality.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:50, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support "It will also take ticks from cattle, and is locally called "tickbird"." A good documentary of cleaning symbiosis. J e e 02:19, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I can't refrain from supporting this one. --Cayambe (talk) 17:10, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful Oppose. Strong noise in the shadow area on capybara. Quality is below FP, sorry -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:13, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Daniel Case: @XRay: @Ximonic: @Famberhorst: @Julian Herzog: @George Chernilevsky: Sorry it's taken me so long to respond. Have reduced chroma noise so have another look and see if you prefer it. I know it's not perfect, but you've got to grab it while you can! Charles (talk) 23:07, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is still grainy but at least it's not as bad as colour noise. The picture is just so whimsical though, I can't not support. dllu (t,c) 23:47, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think I saw the first version of this earlier. In this version, the capybara and the bird look clear to me in full size, and since they're the focus of the picture, it's fine that everything else is to a lesser or greater extent blurred. And it's a really good image. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:26, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice, but per others--Lmbuga (talk) 15:28, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Too nice a couple to oppose. --Tremonist (talk) 15:36, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Going with wow and what are the chances of it ever happening again. Eyes are drawn directly to the subject. --Atsme😊📞 18:11, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- KTC (talk) 01:45, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:59, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals