Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zinnia elegans, plantation, Alhambra, Granada, Spain.jpg

File:Zinnia elegans, plantation, Alhambra, Granada, Spain.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Feb 2016 at 21:01:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants
Info created and uploaded by Jebulon - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:01, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:01, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful oppose Posterization on flowers, more apparent closer to edges. It happens. Daniel Case (talk) 01:21, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks to Arion for his choice. I don't see any (significant or not) posterization on flowers, even on edges.--Jebulon (talk) 11:11, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm very confused. I've found so far that I don't have a good eye for posterization unless maybe it's blindingly obvious. Daniel, do you specifically refer to the middle-tone pinkish flowers, which at full size have less differentiation between their petals than the light pink flowers and many of the yellow ones? If so, then I see that, but at full-page size, the picture looks great. I'll give a vote of Support for this picture, but I would love a brief lesson on seeing posterization. Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:37, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ikan Kekek: Well, I was talking about the red ones near the edges ... in my experience, if any color is likely to show posterization, it's red. For a better understanding read the article and look at the pictures. Daniel Case (talk) 20:09, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Daniel. I've read the article before, but I didn't know there was a Commons category of Posterization. I do see what you're talking about in this photo, and I guess if you really look for it, you can see it at full-page size. Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:20, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to interfere 🤔, is there automatical posterization because of red ? Or is there any posterization in real ? I know what is posterization, I knew the article and the category, but I doubt that this picture could be a good illustration for this "posterization category"...--Jebulon (talk) 22:16, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I was just explaining this to Ikan and passing along my personal observations. Daniel Case (talk) 04:12, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, fine for me. Interesting anyway ! Thanks for comments and interest.--Jebulon (talk) 09:53, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I hope our side discussion of posterization didn't discourage people from voting on this picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:01, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Strange phenomenon indeed, frequently noticed here, regretfully...--Jebulon (talk) 22:28, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment If this photo gets completely ignored, I'd suggest you resubmit it in a few weeks, and I won't ask for a lesson in posterization then. Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:59, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 01:21, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:18, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]