Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ZuidasAmsterdamNederland.jpg
File:ZuidasAmsterdamNederland.jpg, not featured edit
Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2009 at 18:27:27
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Massimo Catarinella -- Massimo Catarinella (talk) 18:27, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support -- Massimo Catarinella (talk) 18:27, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing special. —kallerna™ 20:01, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- How about: Very sharp, almost no noise, great DOF, no CA and a pretty good composition. --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 20:14, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- That's true. But if I'll take a technically perfect photo from some usual thing, like from tissue, will it be FP? —kallerna™ 20:49, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- How about: Very sharp, almost no noise, great DOF, no CA and a pretty good composition. --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 20:14, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose I somehow agree with —kallerna™. Even though the photo was definitely well taken, the composition does not catch much attention. Tiago Fioreze (talk) 19:59, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Technically perfect, composition OK, but no wow factor. Sorry. --Berru (talk) 20:38, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
- Neutral--Kuvaly (talk) 15:22, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with Kallerna, and just to make a point, not be taken personally, but rather as an illustration of critique and analogy... A technically perfect anything does not make it special necessarily... Like we say in spanish "a flower without aroma". It may be beautiful, but the aroma... ahhh that's what flowers are about! --Tomascastelazo (talk) 16:12, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
- That's a great analogy Tomas, and fits this picture perfectly. It'll find a great home in Quality Images, but I have to Oppose it here. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 09:39, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Composition. --Karel (talk) 17:11, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Mywood (talk) 17:19, 14 February 2009 (UTC)