Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Klaus Addicks 2010.jpg
Image:Klaus Addicks 2010.jpg, not featured edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2010 at 11:51:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Genealogist - uploaded by Genealogist - nominated by Limmat-2007 -- Limmat-2007 (talk) 11:51, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Support -- Limmat-2007 (talk) 11:51, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Oppose Too Normal --Thick thi sock (talk) 12:42, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Neutral QI + VI for me, but better would be a bust. Przykuta → [edit] 16:17, 22 June 2010 (UTC)- Oppose - although it's a very nice portrait and I would evaluate it as a quality image, it does not wow me enough for featured. Jonathunder (talk) 22:29, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
- Support good portrait --Mbdortmund (talk) 21:33, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Featured pictures are supposed to wow people. This is too ordinary. Schuylar (talk) 03:08, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral If this guy was famous enough for me to know about him, I would have supported in a heartbeat. But now I've realized that me knowing the subject is not part of the FP criteria. He is notable enough to have wiki pages about him, so it has value beyond portraiture of a random person. As the others have said, this is high quality (IMO better than those watermarked BW ones above). The only thing I struggled with was wow, and looking back at Commons:Featured_pictures/People, I think this is a little short of the notable portraits we've already featured. So, a neutral from me. --99of9 (talk) 23:53, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- Support good portrait --Mbdortmund (talk) 00:54, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 12:29, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
