Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Laubfrosch.jpg

Image:Laubfrosch.jpg, featured

•  Info created and uploaded by Christoph Leeb - nominated by D-Kuru --D-Kuru 13:57, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --D-Kuru 13:57, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose It's quite nice, but for me too many parts of the frog are out of focus and the framing is really unfortunate. --startaq 16:19, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support i like the composition. Good quality. --AngMoKio 19:39, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Good sharpness at main part.--Beyond silence 19:45, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Karelj 22:16, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Nice subject & colors. --Atoma 08:26, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Bad lighting, parts out of focus--Anevrisme 10:06, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support--Mbz1 04:14, 4 August 2007 (UTC)Mbz1
•  Support--Mihael Simonic 10:14, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice !! despite the short depth of field. Benh 17:49, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Unfortunate framing. The portrait format is not adequate for the subject. - Alvesgaspar 17:53, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support I really like this image. Unfortunately, the frog's back leg is out of focus, but I think it's OK. — H92 (t · c · no) 18:16, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too shallow DOF: back and front legs are out of focus. Lycaon 17:37, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose As stated above, it's a very nice picture in which main parts of the frog are well focused while other are not. Focus cannot be fixed now, but framing can. Why should we feature a picture with a failure which is so easy to fix? --Javier ME 22:02, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

If it "is so easy to fix" fix it and upload it :-)

--D-Kuru 21:46, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

•  Support--Econt 21:04, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support-LadyofHats 00:32, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Yes, I support myself, why not? :) --Christoph Leeb 13:14, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Lucas Löffler 19:31, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

result: 13 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Simonizer 08:03, 13 August 2007 (UTC)