Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Mount Rainier panorama 2.jpg

Info created by Deathgleaner - uploaded by Deathgleaner - nominated by Deathgleaner (talk) 04:18, 11 November 2008 (UTC). Another user User:Richardprins helped with stitching the image. See details on Image:Mount Rainier panorama.jpg.[reply]

I have moved this image to Mount Rainier Panorama 2 because it is better. 04:33, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Support -- Deathgleaner (talk) 04:18, 11 November 2008 (UTC).[reply]
Support -- Xizes (talk) 04:20, 11 November 2008 (UTC) Awesome panorama vote struck based on a connection with the nominator --Herby ^{talk thyme} 08:21, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- CRBLEEP (talk) 04:20, 11 November 2008 (UTC) I agree with Xizes.vote struck based on a connection with the nominator --Herby ^{talk thyme} 08:21, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- I'm a new user and I like this panorama. I wish I could take a pic like this. Usedsnake (talk) 03:48, 12 November 2008 (UTC) vote struck based on a connection with the nominator --Herby ^{talk thyme} 08:21, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Color differences in the sky. --Manco Capac (talk) 12:02, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Seems to need cropping to get rid of the car and couple in the leftmost corner, the motorcycle in the rightmost corner, etc. --JY Rehby (talk) 16:45, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If cropped, the panorama will seem incomplete. Thegeo (talk) 19:00, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have cropped it and it looks just fine. If you want more cropping...we'll see. Deathgleaner (talk) 04:43, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support haw haw. Thegeo (talk) 18:54, 12 November 2008 (UTC)vote struck based on a connection with the nominator --Herby ^{talk thyme} 15:08, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The quality isn't good and the people and car half in the picture aren't working for me either. It also suffers from distortion on the right. --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 19:29, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mr. Mario (talk) 03:59, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This FP should not be closed pending a CU review. Thanks --Herby ^{talk thyme} 07:43, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Followup - I have struck three votes & warned the nominator that creating or encouraging multiple accounts is unacceptable. Thanks --Herby ^{talk thyme} 08:21, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I have to agree that the people and vehicles in the image detract from the natrual setting and at full size it appears less sharp than what I have come to expect from fp. --Trödel 23:28, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice overall motive, but several small things do not work: camera position, different crop, car placement, sky colour differences from stitching. -- Klaus with K (talk) 12:55, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too much weirdness going on with sockpuppets attempting to skew the vote here prevents any support from me. How do you turn this on (talk) 12:01, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support It is actually an amazing picture. The view is phenominal and the editing done to the picture to remove the car and people was a pretty sweet feat. I am actually inclined to learn how to do it now. Dima111 (talk) 21:42, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Info Note this is this user's only edit --Trödel 00:21, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - So a user needs to have a certain amount of edits to vote? That's like the rule that you have to be 18 to vote in elections and stuff. Strange... Done! (talk) 04:34, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - Vote struck per CU concerns. — Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 02:02, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      - Checkuser concerns? Give more details. Done! (talk) 04:34, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
        Nothing to do with number of edits & everything to do with number of accounts. You actually do not need this information but it may be of interest to the community that CU shows you are yet another account associated with Deathgleaner - please stop playing these games, it is pointless and abuses the community's trust in such matters. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 07:59, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

result: 2 supports, 5 opposes, 1 neutral => not featured. Benh (talk) 21:35, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

* Oppose --Georgez (talk) 14:56, 20 November 2008 (UTC)too late - Benh (talk) 21:35, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]