Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Aerogel nasa.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2011 at 22:48:54

Info Very dark, very low resolution (Original nomination)
Delist -- Tomer T (talk) 22:48, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nom. W.S. 06:20, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:03, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Idem.--Jebulon (talk) 00:10, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Very dark, very low resolution.--Claus (talk) 12:34, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Seems rare so I say keep unless there's a better alternative for the subject. -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 13:51, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- 1, 2. Tomer T (talk) 15:14, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thank you and obviously I was too lazy to check. Still I like this image. I like that we have an image of a nice, sizeable cube of the stuff which also visually demonstrates how it is solid enough to maintain its shape instead of perhaps melting like warm gelatin which it kind of resembles. -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 22:48, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Jovian Eye _talk 19:38, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nom. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:44, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delist —kallerna™ 07:59, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 8 delist, 1 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:22, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]