Commons:Renomeação de arquivo

This page is a translated version of a page Commons:File renaming and the translation is 89% complete. Changes to the translation template, respectively the source language can be submitted through Commons:File renaming and have to be approved by a translation administrator.

Outdated translations are marked like this.

Shortcuts: COM:FR • COM:MOVE • COM:RENAME

Esta página é considerada um guia oficial do Wikimedia Commons.

Ela ilustra padrões ou comportamentos com os quais a maior parte dos editores concordam em princípio e geralmente seguem. Sinta-se livre para atualizar a página como necessário, mas por favor use a página de discussão para propor modificações significativas.

Esta página em poucas palavras: The file rename function allows authorized users to rename files based on specific criteria, such as improving file names, correcting errors, harmonizing names, and avoiding policy violations. Users can request a rename by filling out a form or using a user script. File redirects are preferred, but in some cases, redirects can be suppressed.

COM:MOVE redireciona pra cá. Para obter informações sobre como mover arquivos de outros projetos, consulte Commons:Moving files to Commons.

A função de renomear arquivos permite renomear (ou "mover") arquivos, o que funciona basicamente da mesma maneira que as movimentações de página "normais". Qualquer usuário pode solicitar uma renomeação de arquivo, mas apenas usuários autorizados podem realmente renomear arquivos por enquanto.

Quais arquivos devem ser renomeados?

Shortcut

COM:FNC

Whether a filename is perceived to be suitable often depends on the familiarity of the individual with the subject, which is often the place depicted. It also occurs that items are known under different terms to different contributors or they believe entities are primarily well-known under the term they are used with to describe this entity, neglecting cultural differences, even within countries.

Not of less importance is the purpose the filename is believed to have; contributors frequently categorizing files have different demands from those who create, process, manage and upload them. Uploaders often have schemas naming their files; moving files might break them. If possible, language and schema should be preserved, as well as the camera or catalogue number.

Commons:File naming describes how files should be named. In general, Commons aims to provide stable filenames as there might be external file clients and file moving involves significant human and computing resources. Thus renaming should be used with caution. Currently there are six widely undisputed uses for rename requests:

#	Aim	Examples (old name)	Examples (new name)
1.	At the original uploader’s request.^[1]
2.	To change from a meaningless or ambiguous name to a name that describes what the image particularly displays.^[2]	File:DSC 1342.jpg (no information at all)	File:Pretoria Venningpark DSC 1342.jpg
		File:20110428 OH K1023900 0014.JPG - Flickr - NZ Defence Force.jpg (only photographer or rights holder)	File:Helicopter A109LUH(NZ) by NZ Defence Force.jpg
		File:20120519 3349.CR2.png (only date)	File:Sebkha-Chott 3349.png
		File:Paris 319.jpg (only broad location)	File:Paris 75018 Rue Norvins no 018 Le Consulat z.jpg
		File:Smartphone.jpg (generic category)	File:Samsung Galaxy Note series (Original, II, and 3).jpg
		File:RAS.jpg (acronym or initials)	File:Rodrigo Arias Sánchez.jpg
		File:Flickr - law keven - Anybody know a Good Dentist^......Happy Furry Friday Everybody...-O))).jpg (no relation to file content)	File:Lion-tailed Macaque, Colchester Zoo, England.jpg
		File:Louvre 12.jpg (inappropriate for specific content)	File:Mona Lisa by Leonardo da Vinci.jpg
3.	To correct obvious errors in filenames, including misspelled proper nouns, incorrect dates, and misidentified objects or organisms.^[3]	File:Ayres Rock 3.png File:Van Gogh portrait 1787.jpg File:Unknown insect 02.jpg	File:Ayers Rock 3.png File:Van Gogh portrait 1887.jpg File:Hogna radiata 02.jpg
4.	To harmonize the names of a set of images so that only one part of all names differs.^[4]	File:Bhf-BS-Icon.svg File:Icon HST bs 1.svg File:Dst symbol.svg	File:BSicon BHF.svg File:BSicon HST.svg File:BSicon DST.svg
5.	To change a filename that would be a violation of Commons’ policies and guidelines if it appeared elsewhere on the project as text. This includes gratuitous vulgarity, personal attacks/harassment, blatant advertising, and cases where revision deletion would be authorized.^[5]	File:Stupid fat idiot.jpg File:Buy now NEW PAINT! 555-6200.png	File:<Name of the person>.jpg File:2007 pink Honda Accord.png
6.	Non-controversial maintenance and bug fixes, including fixing double extensions, invalid or incorrect extensions, character handling problems, and other similar technical issues.^[6]	File:Map of Asia.svg.png File:Computer mouse.jpe File:Mooncake.jpg, File:Mooncake.JPG	File:Map of Asia.png File:Computer mouse.jpg File:Mooncake.jpg, File:Square Mooncake.jpg

Additional information: Please consider creating file redirects instead, where applicable and possible. They are cheap, usually do not break anything and are easily edited or deleted, if required.

↑ Unless there is a compelling reason not to, uploader requests should be honored. This is a courtesy, not an absolute right, however. If a file mover feels that a proposed new name is disruptive or inappropriate, they can suggest a different name or decline the request.
↑
Including:
1. Absolutely no information at all
  Composed entirely of random letters, numbers, and words like “Flickr”, “original”, and “crop”, which do not describe the subject of the image, but may indicate its upload history.
2. Only information is the photographer or rights holder
  The only piece of meaningful information is the name of the photographer or the holder of the copyright.
3. Only information is the date
  Only piece of meaningful information is the date that the photograph was taken on.
4. Only information is the location (broad)
  The only piece of meaningful information is a broad location, such as a city, province, or country. In this case, the location is so large that an average person would not be able to figure out where the image was taken or what the image depicted, without assistance from someone that knows the area.
5. Generic category rather than specific item
  The only piece of meaningful information is a word, such as “smartphone” or “screenshot”, which broadly describes the subject of the file, but does not impart any information that would help someone identify the specific object depicted. This is not just restricted to inanimate objects, it also applies to broad titles or groupings, such as “queen” or “bird”.
6. Acronyms and initials
  The only piece of meaningful information is an acronym or a person’s initials. This differs from “Absolutely no information at all” in that the acronym or initials are related to the subject of the file, even if it takes a second to figure out how.
7. Names that are not meaningless, but do not describe the file
  Contains a coherent description or message that do not describe the subject of the file. Does not apply in cases where the name of the file is the title given to a work of art by the artist that created it, even if the name has nothing to do with what is depicted (for example, many works of Dadaism).
8. Images where the information in the filename, while normally acceptable, is inappropriate for the specific content.
Not including: Specific locations, such as a park, an individual building, or an event.
↑ If an object or organism was incorrectly identified in the filename (such as calling a Sylvilagus floridanus by the name “File:Sylvilagus audubonii.jpg”), this criterion covers renaming the image. If the filename includes words like “unidentified” or “unknown” when describing an object or organism, and that object or organism has been identified, this criterion also covers the change. This criterion does not, however, cover moving a file from its common usage name to its scientific or technical name.
↑ Just because images share a category does not mean that they are part of a set. There are two scenarios that this criterion is designed for. First, certain complex templates (such as those that use BSicons or that display football kits) assume that the images used in them will follow a specific naming convention. Wikisource also uses a specific naming convention for the source files they transcribe. Second, files that form parts of a whole (such as scans from the same book or large images that are divided into smaller portions due to Commons’ upload size restriction) should follow the same naming convention so that they appear together, in order, in categories and lists.
↑ Note that Commons’ neutral point of view differs significantly from that of English Wikipedia. A file like “File:Taiwanese Tiaoyutai islands map.png” would be acceptable on Commons, even though it is not neutrally titled (see here). This does not mean that all non-neutrally worded titles are acceptable, however. An image of a person with the name “File:1BIGGest_nOSE_everS33n.JPG” would not enjoy the same protection.
↑ This is not a catch-all for anything that doesn't fit one of the above. This is for specific technical problems, generally which have a Phabricator task and have been the subject of community discussion.

View →the discussion that led to the selection of these criteria.

Quais arquivos não devem ser renomeados?

Shortcut

COM:FRNOT

Por princípio, é melhor deixar todos os arquivos com nomes geralmente válidos como estão, mesmo que nomes ligeiramente melhores possam existir. Por exemplo:

#	Critérios para recusar	Exemplos (nome antigo)	Exemplos (novo nome)
1.	Os arquivos NÃO devem ser renomeados apenas porque o novo nome parece um pouco melhor.	File:TowerBridge'09.jpg	File:Tower_Bridge_2009.jpg
1.		File:Logo_correct.jpg	File:Logo.jpg
2.	Os arquivos NÃO devem ser renomeados apenas para traduzir o nome do arquivo para outro idioma e/ou porque o nome do arquivo não está corretamente capitalizado. Lembre que o Commons é um projeto multilíngue, então não há razão para favorecer o inglês em relação a outras línguas.	File:Rathaus_bremen.jpg	File:Bremen_town_hall.jpg
3.	Se um arquivo em um projeto local conflitar com o nome de um arquivo no Commons, o arquivo no projeto local deve ser renomeado. Renomeá-lo no Commons significaria alterá-lo em vários projetos, em vez de apenas um.
4.	Arquivos com problemas de direitos autorais NÃO devem ser renomeados até que os problemas de direitos autorais sejam resolvidos. Não há razão para renomear um arquivo se ele for excluído por motivos de direitos autorais.

Convenções de nomenclatura adicionais e exceções da lista acima podem ser discutidas para projetos específicos. Por exemplo, mover arquivos PDF e DjVu transcluídos no Wikisource pode ser problemático para essas wikis.

Um usuário que renomeia arquivos repetidamente por motivos inválidos pode perder o privilégio de movedor. Aviso: certos casos de guerra de moção — como a reversão de uma renomeação anterior que tinha uma razão válida — pode resultar na remoção do privilégio de moção, mesmo para uma infração.

Como renomear um arquivo

Gadget Movefile

Todo usuário pode solicitar a renomeação de um arquivo, mas somente usuários autorizados podem efetuá-la por enquanto.

To request a file rename while logged in, select "More → Move" near the top right of the file page, then fill in the provided form (this functionality is provided by the default gadget RenameLink). Users who do not have an account or are unwilling to run JavaScript can request a file rename by adding the template

{{Rename|required newname.ext|required rationale number|reason=required text reason}}

to the file description. Either way, the file will be added to Category:Media requiring renaming and an authorised user will perform the move if it conforms to the guidelines described above. There could be a delay of a few hours to several days depending on the type and language of the request.

Os editores respondentes devem seguir as instruções da predefinição. Na maioria dos casos, um redirecionamento deve ser deixado na página original, exceto se for um nome enganoso ou promocional.

Os usuários autorizados são administradores, movedores de arquivos e stewards da Wikimedia. (As solicitações para tornar-se um movedor de arquivos estão listadas em Commons:Requests for rights#Filemover.) Se você pertence a qualquer um desses grupos e, portanto, tem o direito movefile, basta usar a guia "Mover e substituir" como faria normalmente com uma página normal.

Renomear em massa

Um script de usuário que pode renomear muitos arquivos: User:Legoktm/massrename.js.

Trocas do nome do arquivo

Para realizar trocas de nome de arquivo, você precisa do direito suppressredirect. Por exemplo, alguém carregou dois arquivos: "Anverso do Token.jpg" e "Reverso do Token.jpg", mas a imagem do "anverso" mostra de fato o reverso, e o reverso mostra o anverso. Nesse caso, você teria que:

Mover o "Anverso do Token.jpg" para "Nome temporário do Token.jpg"

Mover o "Reverso do Token".jpg" para "Anverso do Token.jpg" sem deixar um redirecionamento.
Mover "Nome temporário do Token.jpg" para "Reverso do Token.jpg" sem deixar um redirecionamento.

Deixar redirecionamentos

Quando você move (renomeia) um arquivo usando a guia Mover, por padrão o título antigo se tornará automaticamente uma página de redirecionamento para o novo título. Além disso, urls para o nome antigo também redirecionarão (no entanto, links diretos para a versão em tamanho real do arquivo não redirecionarão). Redirecionamentos para o arquivo movido são atualizados automaticamente ao usar Mover e substituir para evitar redirecionamentos duplos.^[1] Se você não usar Mover e substituir, terá que atualizar todos os redirecionamentos para o arquivo manualmente.

Todos os movimentadores de arquivos têm o direito de usuário suppressredirect.^[2] Isso permite que os movimentadores de arquivos não deixem para trás um redirecionamento ao mover os arquivos e, em vez disso, tenham automaticamente o nome do arquivo original excluído. A política nunca exige que você suprima o redirecionamento, a supressão de redirecionamentos é totalmente opcional.

A supressão de redirecionamentos só é permitida nos seguintes casos:

Para mover arquivos carregados recentemente com um erro óbvio no nome do arquivo onde esse erro não seria um redirecionamento útil. Por exemplo: mover "Ovelha em uma árvore.jpg" para "Esquilo em uma árvore.jpg" quando a imagem realmente retrata um esquilo.
Para realizar trocas do nome do arquivo.
Quando o nome do arquivo original contém vandalismo. (Critério de renomeação #5)

Observe que esta capacidade deve ser usada apenas em certas circunstâncias e apenas se você tiver certeza absoluta de que não irá interromper a exibição do arquivo em nenhum projeto. Os redirecionamentos nunca devem ser suprimidos se o arquivo estiver em uso em qualquer projeto. Em caso de dúvida, deixe um redirecionamento.

Se você se esquecer de suprimir o redirecionamento em caso de vandalismo no nome do arquivo ou se não estiver totalmente certo se o nome do arquivo original é realmente vandalismo, deixe um redirecionamento e marque o redirecionamento para exclusão rápida por G2.

A quebra maliciosa ou imprudente de links de arquivos por meio do direito de usuário suppressredirect é considerada um abuso do direito de mover arquivos e é motivo para a revogação imediata desse direito.

Como suprimir um redirecionamento

Se você estiver usando o script mover e substituir, haverá uma caixa de seleção que diz "Deixar um redirecionamento para trás". Isso é verificado automaticamente e não pode ser desativado se o arquivo estiver em uso. Se o arquivo não estiver em uso, desmarcar a caixa irá suprimir o redirecionamento e não será criado ao mover o arquivo. A caixa de seleção "Deixar um redirecionamento para trás" também está disponível na página especial geral, Special:MovePage, que pode ser encontrada procurando por Special:MovePage/PAGENAME na barra de pesquisa.

To easily bypass the move and replace script on file pages and use the special page instead, a new tab must be opened through the move and replace button. Depending on your mouse settings you may be able to do this by "middle clicking" (clicking the mouse wheel) on the move and replace button. For others you can right click on the move and replace button and open in a new tab. Please note, the special page will not attempt to replace any usage of the file on any pages it is on.

Existe um registro de renomeações de arquivos?

Todas as renomeações de arquivos são registradas no log de movimentação, que é um log de todas as movimentações em todos os domínios. Não há filtro de domínio para "somente arquivos" disponível ainda.

Movedores de arquivo atuais

Lista de todos os movedores de arquivos (atualmente 1 639).
Administradores também têm acesso à ferramenta (atualmente 185).
Os stewards podem renomear arquivos em todos os projetos da Wikimedia. Para uma visão geral, veja a lista de stewards no Meta.

Ver também

Categoria:Mídia que requer renomeação (por justificativa) — categoria para arquivos a serem renomeados.
Direitos do grupo de filemover (movedores de arquivos)
Commons:Estatísticas de moções
Commons:Renomear uma categoria
Commons:Renomear uma predefinição
Ajuda:Redirecionamento de arquivo
Ferramenta Massrename
MediaWiki:Filename-prefix-blacklist — nomes de arquivos que o próprio software MediaWiki impede de serem carregados.
Commons:Renomeação de arquivo/Substituição global
Pedidos de renomeação recusados recentemente

Referências

[1] Unless there is a compelling reason not to, uploader requests should be honored. This is a courtesy, not an absolute right, however. If a file mover feels that a proposed new name is disruptive or inappropriate, they can suggest a different name or decline the request.

[2] Including:

Absolutely no information at all
Composed entirely of random letters, numbers, and words like “Flickr”, “original”, and “crop”, which do not describe the subject of the image, but may indicate its upload history.

Only information is the photographer or rights holder
The only piece of meaningful information is the name of the photographer or the holder of the copyright.

Only information is the date
Only piece of meaningful information is the date that the photograph was taken on.

Only information is the location (broad)
The only piece of meaningful information is a broad location, such as a city, province, or country. In this case, the location is so large that an average person would not be able to figure out where the image was taken or what the image depicted, without assistance from someone that knows the area.

Generic category rather than specific item
The only piece of meaningful information is a word, such as “smartphone” or “screenshot”, which broadly describes the subject of the file, but does not impart any information that would help someone identify the specific object depicted. This is not just restricted to inanimate objects, it also applies to broad titles or groupings, such as “queen” or “bird”.

Acronyms and initials
The only piece of meaningful information is an acronym or a person’s initials. This differs from “Absolutely no information at all” in that the acronym or initials are related to the subject of the file, even if it takes a second to figure out how.

Names that are not meaningless, but do not describe the file
Contains a coherent description or message that do not describe the subject of the file. Does not apply in cases where the name of the file is the title given to a work of art by the artist that created it, even if the name has nothing to do with what is depicted (for example, many works of Dadaism).

Images where the information in the filename, while normally acceptable, is inappropriate for the specific content.

Not including: Specific locations, such as a park, an individual building, or an event.

[3] Absolutely no information at all
Composed entirely of random letters, numbers, and words like “Flickr”, “original”, and “crop”, which do not describe the subject of the image, but may indicate its upload history.

[4] Only information is the photographer or rights holder
The only piece of meaningful information is the name of the photographer or the holder of the copyright.

[5] Only information is the date
Only piece of meaningful information is the date that the photograph was taken on.

[6] Only information is the location (broad)
The only piece of meaningful information is a broad location, such as a city, province, or country. In this case, the location is so large that an average person would not be able to figure out where the image was taken or what the image depicted, without assistance from someone that knows the area.

[7] Generic category rather than specific item
The only piece of meaningful information is a word, such as “smartphone” or “screenshot”, which broadly describes the subject of the file, but does not impart any information that would help someone identify the specific object depicted. This is not just restricted to inanimate objects, it also applies to broad titles or groupings, such as “queen” or “bird”.

[8] Acronyms and initials
The only piece of meaningful information is an acronym or a person’s initials. This differs from “Absolutely no information at all” in that the acronym or initials are related to the subject of the file, even if it takes a second to figure out how.

[9] Names that are not meaningless, but do not describe the file
Contains a coherent description or message that do not describe the subject of the file. Does not apply in cases where the name of the file is the title given to a work of art by the artist that created it, even if the name has nothing to do with what is depicted (for example, many works of Dadaism).

[10] Images where the information in the filename, while normally acceptable, is inappropriate for the specific content.

[3] If an object or organism was incorrectly identified in the filename (such as calling a Sylvilagus floridanus by the name “File:Sylvilagus audubonii.jpg”), this criterion covers renaming the image. If the filename includes words like “unidentified” or “unknown” when describing an object or organism, and that object or organism has been identified, this criterion also covers the change. This criterion does not, however, cover moving a file from its common usage name to its scientific or technical name.

[4] Just because images share a category does not mean that they are part of a set. There are two scenarios that this criterion is designed for. First, certain complex templates (such as those that use BSicons or that display football kits) assume that the images used in them will follow a specific naming convention. Wikisource also uses a specific naming convention for the source files they transcribe. Second, files that form parts of a whole (such as scans from the same book or large images that are divided into smaller portions due to Commons’ upload size restriction) should follow the same naming convention so that they appear together, in order, in categories and lists.

[5] Note that Commons’ neutral point of view differs significantly from that of English Wikipedia. A file like “File:Taiwanese Tiaoyutai islands map.png” would be acceptable on Commons, even though it is not neutrally titled (see here). This does not mean that all non-neutrally worded titles are acceptable, however. An image of a person with the name “File:1BIGGest_nOSE_everS33n.JPG” would not enjoy the same protection.

[6] This is not a catch-all for anything that doesn't fit one of the above. This is for specific technical problems, generally which have a Phabricator task and have been the subject of community discussion.

[15] Absolutely no information at all
Composed entirely of random letters, numbers, and words like “Flickr”, “original”, and “crop”, which do not describe the subject of the image, but may indicate its upload history.

[16] Only information is the photographer or rights holder
The only piece of meaningful information is the name of the photographer or the holder of the copyright.

[17] Only information is the date
Only piece of meaningful information is the date that the photograph was taken on.

[18] Only information is the location (broad)
The only piece of meaningful information is a broad location, such as a city, province, or country. In this case, the location is so large that an average person would not be able to figure out where the image was taken or what the image depicted, without assistance from someone that knows the area.

[19] Generic category rather than specific item
The only piece of meaningful information is a word, such as “smartphone” or “screenshot”, which broadly describes the subject of the file, but does not impart any information that would help someone identify the specific object depicted. This is not just restricted to inanimate objects, it also applies to broad titles or groupings, such as “queen” or “bird”.

[20] Acronyms and initials
The only piece of meaningful information is an acronym or a person’s initials. This differs from “Absolutely no information at all” in that the acronym or initials are related to the subject of the file, even if it takes a second to figure out how.

[21] Names that are not meaningless, but do not describe the file
Contains a coherent description or message that do not describe the subject of the file. Does not apply in cases where the name of the file is the title given to a work of art by the artist that created it, even if the name has nothing to do with what is depicted (for example, many works of Dadaism).

[22] Images where the information in the filename, while normally acceptable, is inappropriate for the specific content.

[AQD-7] MediaWiki:Gadget-AjaxQuickDelete.js

[8] :T236348

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[1]

[2]