Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 11 2020

Consensual review edit

File:Isla de Corbera, Santander, España, 2019-08-15, DD 68 orig.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Corbera Island, Santander, Spain --Poco a poco 00:51, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   OpposeNot much of it is sharp. --Kallerna 19:15, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
      New version with unsharper areas cropped out Poco a poco 19:03, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
    As there is no reaction, I'd like to gather more feedback, please. --Poco a poco 19:12, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support given the difficult underwater situation. --Aristeas (talk) 19:13, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Flat-out good photo to my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek 21:20, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support QI for me too. --P. Branquart (alias PJDespa) talk 22:57, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Seven Pandas 21:03, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

File:St._George's_Church_with_a_Rolling_tower.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Category "Specially protected natural territories of Russia". Nature monument "Old Ladoga". This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2020. --Александр Байдуков 20:24, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
      Oppose Sorry but the sky doesn't look natural. It looks like a local or gradual filter has been applied to bring up shadows of teh bottom and then local filter for the sky to make it darker but it's well visible --Podzemnik 20:39, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
      Support I see a beautiful image and good quality. Please discuss -- Spurzem 20:55, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
      Oppose Bad post-processing, haloes are too prominent. --King of Hearts 21:21, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Really nice composition, but low DOF, overprocessed and perspective issues. --Smial 08:53, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per King of Hearts --Johannes Maximilian 18:56, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per KoH, visible in thumbnail size Poco a poco 19:38, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose →   Declined   --Seven Pandas 21:02, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Берёзовый_лес_в_районе_утёса_Скрипер.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Берег Байкала вблизи утёса Скрипер --Veteran hiker 06:06, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support A bit soft, but good quality --Michielverbeek 06:21, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree for now. No geo tag, no description, no categories --Podzemnik 20:50, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment One category was added. I would support if a category for the type of trees shown in the photo is added. -- Ikan Kekek 09:21, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support It is a QI IMO, the category is in English, we know where the picture was taken. The translation of the name of the file is 'Birch forest near Skriper cliff' --P. Branquart (alias PJDespa) talk 20:59, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Question So what's the problem in adding the appropriate category for this type of birch tree? -- Ikan Kekek 01:05, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment It is not a problem, indeed. You are right. I was giving my opinion about the image (by supporting it for a QI promotion even without the appropriate category for the birch) as the discussion was opened. By supporting the image, I was not giving an answer to your first comment. Best regards. --P. Branquart (alias PJDespa) talk 20:09, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
  • @PJDespa: We have guidelines to this, see Commons:Image_guidelines#Location. The image's description and GEO tag lacking doesn't respect the guidelines. QIs should be setting up good examples for others to follow, this image is unfortunately not doing so. --Podzemnik 22:26, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Seven Pandas 21:01, 10 August 2020 (UTC)