Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 21 2015

• 
  • Nomination Mushrooms on dead wood. location, Stuttering Bosch in the Lende valley. Province of Friesland in the Netherlands.
    Famberhorst 04:40, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:56, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Semporna, Sabah: An elderly Bajau on his lepa (the traditional Bajau boat) during the Regatta Lepa event 2015) --Cccefalon 04:10, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice.--Famberhorst 04:46, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Johannes Rau monument in front of Villa Horion, Düsseldorf, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:37, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:44, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tetrameles nudiflora, Conolly's Plot,Nilambur --Vengolis 03:30, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:06, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Robber Fly (Cyrtopogon sp) --Vengolis 03:30, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:06, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sphagneticola calendulacea --Vengolis 03:30, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:06, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hibiscus rosa-sinensis --Vengolis 03:30, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:06, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Flower of Papaver somniferum in Antalya Province, Turkey --Bgag 03:04, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 03:21, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Parish church Saint Mary Magdalene, Ruden, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:26, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 03:13, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Subsidiary church Saints Philip and James at Briefelsdorf, Feldkirchen, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:26, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 03:04, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Subsidiary church Saint Lambert at Hart, Feldkirchen, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:26, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 03:22, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Subsidiary church Saint Mary at Maria Feicht, Glanegg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:26, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 03:04, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Parish church Saint Daniel at Goeltschach, Maria Rain, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:26, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:42, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lariño, Carnota, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 22:07, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:23, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sign of the beach of Lariño, Carnota, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 22:07, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 22:18, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Essex skipper (Thymelicus lineola) female --Charlesjsharp 21:02, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Atamari 21:10, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The cruise ship Silver Wind in the bay of Kotor, viewed from Lepetani's road, in Montenegro. --Gzzz 20:51, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:00, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The cruise ship Silver Wind in the bay of Kotor, viewed from Lepetani's road, in Montenegro. In the background, on the right, the town of Perast. In the foreground, the church Gospe od anđela (Our Lady of Angels). --Gzzz 20:51, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:00, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Schiliar from Kastelruth --Moroder 17:08, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion WOW! to me its a candidate for Futured pictures / POTY. --Ralf Roletschek 17:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination ehem. Wikickler-Brauerei, gesehen vom Hardtberg, Wuppertal --Atamari 17:02, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline Hazy, blurry, CA, sorry. Denis Barthel 22:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ehrengab der Familie von Carnap, ev.reformierter Friedhof Hochstraße, Wuppertal --Atamari 17:02, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:04, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Columns, Erechtheum, Acropolis, Athens, Greece.--Jebulon 14:32, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Amazing composition. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:33, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination US Coast Guard plaque at Utah Beach, Manche, Normandy, France.--Jebulon 14:31, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:54, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Reinforced concrete of a german bunker at Pointe du Hoc, close-up. Calvados, Normandy, France.--Jebulon 14:29, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:54, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Plaque for the "One Charlie" Churchill tank at Graye-sur Mer, Calvados, Normandy, France.--Jebulon 14:27, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:54, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Horizon at Omaha Beach, nowadays. Calvados, Normandy, France.--Jebulon 14:24, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:56, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wing underside view of a female hermit (Chazara briseis). Darboğaz - Ulukışla, Niğde, Turkey. --Zcebeci 14:16, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:56, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A large white (Pieris brassicae) nectaring of thistle flower. Darboğaz - Ulukışla, Niğde, Turkey. --Zcebeci 14:16, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:32, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A male Fiery Copper (Lycaena thetis) feeding on wild peppermint flower (Mentha sp.). Ulukışla - Niğde, Turkey. --Zcebeci 14:16, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:31, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination S/S Stockholm arriving in Vaxholm with Vaxholm castle in the background. --ArildV 13:16, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Very beautiful. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:14, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Yellow Garden Spider (Argiope aurantia), Punta Pitt, San Cristobal island, Galapagos islands, Ecuador --Poco a poco 13:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Nice. Charlesjsharp 21:05, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Galapagos land iguana (Conolophus subcristatus), Santa Cruz island, Galapagos islands, Ecuador --Poco a poco 13:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:17, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Marine iguana (Amblyrhynchus cristatus), Tortuga Bay, Santa Cruz island, Galapagos islands, Ecuador --Poco a poco 13:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--ArildV 13:33, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Great blue heron (Ardea herodias), Las Bachas, Baltra island, Galapagos islands, Ecuador --Poco a poco 13:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--ArildV 13:33, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Great frigatebird (Fregata minor), San Cristobal island, Galapagos islands, Ecuador --Poco a poco 13:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Zcebeci 14:18, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Huvudskär lighthouse. --ArildV 11:32, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:36, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Croatia, Pula, Temple of Roma and Augustus, view from north --Berthold Werner 11:29, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--ArildV 13:34, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ceiling of Sant'Antonio in Campo Marzio --Livioandronico2013 07:40, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:49, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dome of Sant'Antonio in Campo Marzio HDR --Livioandronico2013 07:36, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:49, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
     Comment Should be brightened a little bit IMO. There seems to be something wrong with your HDR workflow. Bright parts are still too bright and dark parts are still too dark. How do you do the HDR? --Code 09:06, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Decoration of Nostra Signora del Sacro Cuore (Rome) --Livioandronico2013 07:36, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:49, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Waterfall of Tamda.--Vikoula5 08:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Sorry, poor quality: Unsharp, small and continuous points with overexposition (see note), small and continuous points with underexposition (see note), poor detail. Oversaturated. --Lmbuga 00:05, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Detail of Airbus A-380 at Paris CDG --Ralf Roletschek 06:09, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 06:47, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Airport vehicle at Paris CDG --Ralf Roletschek 06:09, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 06:46, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Airport Paris Charles de Gaulle --Ralf Roletschek 06:09, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 06:44, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Edzná, Campeche, Provinz Campeche, Mexico --Ralf Roletschek 06:09, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 06:42, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Building Five Storeys, Edzná, Yucatan, Mexico --Ralf Roletschek 06:09, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 06:42, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Leica AF-C1, produced by Minolta, front view. By User:Kameraprojekt Graz 2015 --Papperlapap 05:49, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion A minor stacking problem (see my note), but good quality. --Cccefalon 06:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 18 Kościelna Street in Lądek-Zdrój 1 --Jacek Halicki 05:35, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 05:37, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 18 Kościelna Street in Lądek-Zdrój 2 --Jacek Halicki 05:35, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:37, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 18 Kościelna Street in Lądek-Zdrój 3 --Jacek Halicki 05:35, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:43, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 18 Kościelna Street in Lądek-Zdrój 4 --Jacek Halicki 05:35, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 05:37, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 18 Kościelna Street in Lądek-Zdrój 5 --Jacek Halicki 05:35, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:32, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rosa pimpinellifolia. Location. Lauwersmeer National Park in the Netherlands.
    Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:34, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Girona, Spain. The newer district is to the left, the historic district to the center, and the old walls and the boundary of the suburbs to the right. The Pyrenees are seen in the background. -- Mgimelfarb 05:01, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 05:56, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from the water on the Alde Feanen of It Fryske Gea. Valuable nature in profince Friesland in the Netherlands.
    Famberhorst 04:39, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 05:01, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Several balloons simultaneously in the air during the Hot Air Balloon Festival in Joure province of Friesland in the Netherlands.
    Famberhorst 04:39, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 05:01, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Semporna, Sabah: TM Lahad Datu (Telekom Malaysia Lahad Datu Branch)) --Cccefalon 04:09, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 05:38, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Semporna, Sabah: A Bajau Igal dancer in the bow of a lepa (the traditional Bajau boat) during the Regatta Lepa event 2015. The janggay (metal "fingernails") are used to emphasize the dancer’s hand movements. --Cccefalon 04:09, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 05:38, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Town of Atrani on the Amalfi Coast, Italy. -- Mgimelfarb 04:01, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Port, Düsseldorf, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:38, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 04:59, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Heinrich Heine monument at Schwanenmarkt (Bert Gerresheim, 1978/81), Düsseldorf, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:38, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 04:59, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Parish church Saint Gangolf and rectory at Sankt Gandolf, Glanegg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:17, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Porch of the parish church Saint Gangolf at Sankt Gandolf, Glanegg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:17, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. I know this church, there is nothing straight at all! --Hubertl 05:04, 18 August 2015 (UTC) Well observed. It is the way it is. --Johann Jaritz 08:00, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Residential building, former courthouse at Kallitsch, Feldkirchen, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:17, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:46, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gothic apse of the subsidiary church Saint Mary at Maria Feicht, Glanegg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:17, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 05:04, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Spaso-Preobrazhensky cathedral, choir loft arches. --PereslavlFoto 00:46, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 06:36, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Forelock from the two horse tamers monuments, which were created by Theodor Friedl and Georg Jahn in 1893.Kaiserforum, Vienna --Hubertl 23:17, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn Not QI. Withdrawn. --Hubertl 05:40, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Side view of Fountain D, Artist: Edmund Paul Andreas Hofmann von Aspernburg --Hubertl 23:17, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion mach mal den Grauschleier weg --Ralf Roletschek 06:36, 18 August 2015 (UTC) Danke, Ralf, war ja furchtbar! --Hubertl 11:08, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wayside cross near Salem-Beuren, Germany --DKrieger 21:46, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:57, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hardt-Anlagen, Wuppertal --Atamari 17:25, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 05:59, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hardt-Anlagen, Wuppertal --Atamari 17:25, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 05:59, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 71 years later, a bombing crater still visible at Pointe du Hoc, Calvados, Normandy, France.--Jebulon 17:16, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 05:59, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Icehole and firtrees in St. Oswald Kastelruth --Moroder 21:29, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:58, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Klyde Warren Park in Dallas, Texas (United States). --Michael Barera 00:34, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality. Composition --Moroder 14:07, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ángel de la Independencia, Ciudad de México. --Warko 00:43, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
    There is some noise in the column, can you reduce it? Poco a poco 15:34, 13 August 2015 (UTC)  Comment is it just me or camera focused on a sky instead of a statue? --SkywalkerPL 22:01, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Not sharp and too noisy. A noise correction would make the main subject more unsharp. Sorry.--Jebulon 14:46, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Panorama of Mt Everest and Nuptse with the Changri glacier moraine below. By User:Joneismyartistname --Yann 20:52, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline At least one stitching error. Sky very noisy (fixable). Some regions already slightly posterized. --Cccefalon 21:03, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
     Not done --Cccefalon 09:57, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View on the ridges of the Sancy from the Puy de la Tâche, parc naturel régional des volcans d'Auvergne. By User:JeliaFr --Yann 21:44, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline Overall good quality but needs removal of the green fringe on the mountain ridge (see note). --Cccefalon 05:01, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
     Not done --Cccefalon 09:56, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Termessos - Theatre --Imehling 12:23, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn Insufficient quality. Overprocessed --Moroder 10:00, 13 August 2015 (UTC) Please, could you be a little bit more specific? I actually did no more processing than normalization and slightly enhanced sharpness. --Imehling 11:59, 13 August 2015 (UTC) Comment It is a very nice composition but the quality of detail does not satisfy me. Probably because of the sharpening and maybe too much contrast also. The sky btw does not look natural but oversaturated. I don't mind if you put it for discussion. Cheers --Moroder 15:23, 13 August 2015 (UTC) Ok --Imehling 16:35, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Carter Cotton Building, part of the Vancouver Film School, Canada --Xicotencatl 22:14, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Comment It needs a bit exposure reducing and right rotating. --Hockei 17:48, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
     Done--Xicotencatl 07:52, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
     Not done The left side of the building is still leaning out. Exposure is OK now. --Hockei 14:41, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
     Comment Sorry, I could not fix this. Thanks for the review. --Xicotencatl 06:46, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
    It's back, thanks for the help Hockei. --Xicotencatl 06:06, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
     Neutral Maybe anybody else can review it. Because of my own editing (vertical correction and exposure) I don't vote for it. --Hockei 12:17, 16 August 2015 (UTC) Support Busy, but good enough for QI.--Jebulon 14:43, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Sandakan_Sabah_Shell-Station-Labuk_Road-01.jpg

• Nomination Sandakan, Sabah: Shell Station Labuk Road --Cccefalon 04:05, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Missing only a written and is an excellent advertising --Livioandronico2013 08:52, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose  Comment Logos all over the place with no appropriate template and categorization. --SkywalkerPL 22:01, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

 Comment The SHELL brand is within the categories. All logos are COM:De minimis. It is hence not a must, to add a template. All criteria for QIC are met. Please do not introduce new rules without consent. --Cccefalon 04:14, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

 Comment This is not a case of De minimis logo. Logos belong to the primary subject of this photograph, you even put the company name in a title of your file. --SkywalkerPL 08:38, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

To which QIC rule are you referring with your critics, please? And why not just adding a template, if it is disturbing for you? --Cccefalon 12:41, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

This one: Image page requirements Copyright status. Quality image candidates have to be uploaded to Commons under a suitable license. But I see that the issue is resolved now. In either case, lesson for future: use the De minimis#Guidelines before trying to apply it. --SkywalkerPL 09:40, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

You haven't understood QIC so far: The requirement of a suitable license has nothing to do with trademarks. It is referring to COM:LIC. There, you can also find an important explanation:

It is important to make the distinction between copyright, trademarks, and patents. Wikimedia Commons generally only enforces copyright restrictions, for these reasons:

Almost anything can be trademarked, and it wouldn't make sense to forbid everything.

Trademarks and industrial designs restrictions are pertinent to industrial reproduction, but photographs of such items can otherwise be freely reproduced.

--Cccefalon 07:12, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Due to the short lens the big transparency seems a bit too broad. But QI for me. -- Spurzem 12:53, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Categories do not interest me and have no effect on the quality of a photo. --Ralf Roletschek 16:26, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Here, a "quality image" is NOT only an image with technical qualities. Please read the guidelines !!!!! --Jebulon 22:04, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
    • Jebulon, there was an appropriate category Category:Shell Station Labuk Road from the very beginning available. Beside other categories, this category had an overcategory Category:Shell Malaysia. The guideline was perfectly met from the very beginning. --Cccefalon 08:17, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
      • Of course. Sorry for the misunderstanding. My comment is an answer to Ralf, who is an activist against perspective corrections and useful categorizations for years . Please notice that I did not vote !--Jebulon 21:12, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support per resolved copyright issue. --SkywalkerPL (talk) 09:44, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment  Oppose and  Support in the same time is not possible in CR. You have to strike out one or both of your votes. --Cccefalon 08:19, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment SkywalkerPL? o or s, please delete one with < s > </ s > and ur sign --Jean11 22:01, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support QI --Atamari 21:47, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 05:10, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Lac de Saint Andéol en juillet.JPG

• Nomination Lake of Saint Andéol on the Aubrac plateau (Massif central, France)--Jmp48 10:23, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Insufficient quality. Loss of details in the water and background. --Cccefalon 20:57, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Franchement n'importe quoi. Il faut être compétent avant de juger ! --Jmp48 06:49, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
    •  Comment What do you want to say? You think, after reviewing thousands of images, I am still not competent enough to recognize the flaws of your nomination? You still can send it to CR, if you disagree my rating. --Cccefalon 09:35, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Some minor flaws indeed, but imo good enough for QI. --Palauenc05 11:13, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Noisy sky, unsharp background: the focus seems to be on the foreground --KL KL 19:09, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment I don't understand. There are clouds in the sky pusched by the wind. It's normal.--Jmp48 10:20, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
    •  Comment There can be clouds in the sky, that's perfectly fine. There is noise (see section Noise in COM:I) in the sky, which consists of grainy clouds and a grainy blue sky. In my opinion this noise could be acceptable if there was not the sharpness issue. But for instance if you look at the grass on the left in the middle, it is totally unsharp and looks blurred. --KL KL 11:56, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Compression problems, either blurry or overcompressed --Shansov.net 23:26, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment This photo is not compressed.--Jmp48 10:20, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

 Comment Jmp48, the guys here are just trying to explain, where the visible flaws in the image are coming from. Sometimes, it is not possible to give accurate reasons, because no one was sitting behind you, when you postprocessed the image. You probably would be not happy, if the decline does not comes with an explanation. You might take the comments as a help for your future work on your images.

However, I want to point out, that the settings of your camera are not really appropriate for a landscape shot. It might have been better to choose a landscape-appropriate aperture (e.g. 8 or 9 instead of 6.4) and in the same time reducing the shutter time. For a static motiv 1/125 is good enough. You might tell me, that you just set it to "Automatic" .... well, if yes, do not complain, that the result is just random. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 10:02, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

f/8 is not a good idea when using a compact camera with small sensor. In case of that fuji camera f/8 would be equivalent to f/45 in 135 film format. So Fuji decided to limit the aperture setting to f/6.4 (in wide angle range), which still is equivalent to f/35 in 135er. The same lens has a maximum f-stop of f/3.1 (wide angle) which corresponds to aperture f/16 in terms of diffraction and DOF, compared to 135 film. --Smial 12:15, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for enlightening me :) But what is the conclusion concerning the image: Is it bad quality because of bad camera operation or bad postprocessing in your opinion? --Cccefalon 17:11, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

•  Oppose The discussion is inappropriate: dismal quality. As other users--Lmbuga 00:16, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 05:11, 20 August 2015 (UTC)