Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 17 2023

Consensual review edit

File:Open_Wing_Basking_of_Junonia_hierta_(Fabricius,_1798)_-_Yellow_Pansy_WLB_DSC_9077a.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Open Wing Basking of Junonia hierta (Fabricius, 1798) - Yellow PansyThis image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Butterfly. --TAPAN1412 05:23, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Acceptable! --Plozessor 06:21, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose just under the bar, but 3rd opinion please --Charlesjsharp 09:12, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I agree with Charles Poco a poco 09:44, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support After all, the photo has over 8 MPixels and is therefore significantly larger than many other images on the same subject that have already been recognised as QI, as well as being perfectly printable in A4 size, even if you crop it a little smaller. The sharpness of the image also benefits greatly from the fact that it has not been excessively denoised to destroy detail. --Smial 12:56, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Smial ; it has been upscaled to achieve its current size; that doesn't eliminate the defects. Charlesjsharp 12:17, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
  •   Neutral This is one of the borderline cases that I won't support. It is rather low in detail and very noisy, because this was taken with ISO 3,200. However, it looks somewhat better than most of the other recent high-ISO butterfly images. I just added the species category, which was missing. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:44, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support undefined 13:21, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Anna.Massiniundefined 13:21, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support per Smial --Kritzolina 06:41, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:42, 17 December 2023 (UTC)