Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 14 2023

Consensual review edit

File:20220715 Centaurea cyanus.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Flower of Palafoxia spec near a field --FlocciNivis 10:03, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:47, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose for now for misidentification. I can see some flower heads of a cultivar of Centaurea cyanus with pink flowers and presumably some borage in the background, but nothing as exotic as a Palafoxia species from America. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:41, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
  •   Comment I noticed this borage, too. At least it could be mentioned in the description, but if it's the wrong taxation of the flower herself file should definitely be renamed.--Der Angemeldete 13:02, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
  •   Comment Thanks to the author for the correction. Description, categories and the intended file name are o.k. now. The borage has not been mentioned, but it is out of focus (as most of the image, except for two flower heads in the center). So (at least for me) taxonomy is not a reason to oppose this photograph any more, but I remain neutral because of the rather small part of the photograph that is in focus. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 14:01, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
    • Feel free to change the description and mention the borage, if you think this is worth mentioning. I do have no problems with users improving the categories or descriptions of pictures I've taken --FlocciNivis (talk) 15:49, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support The mention of borage here was my only deep and dark desire. I'll promote this as good quality!--Der Angemeldete 21:15, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:41, 13 February 2023 (UTC)