Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 04 2024

Consensual review edit

File:Bochum,_Beckmanns_Hof,_2023-04_CN-01.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Barn of “Hof Beckmann” in Bochum --Carschten 17:28, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support This would be even better if you could brighten the shadows a bit (the front of the house is quite dark). --Plozessor 17:37, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
  •   Comment Note that my comment was just a comment, no decline, so wondering why this has been moved to discussion. --Plozessor 07:03, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
  •   Comment Of course but we don't agree, and I don't want to support, without a clearly visible discussion in the discuss section. But feel free to cancel. --Sebring12Hrs 08:30, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
  •   Done @Plozessor: I have slightly brightened the shadows on the facade. In my opinion, more would look unrealistic and unattractive, the sunlight was relatively strong that day, but the details in the darker areas are still sufficient. I hope you like it better this way. --Carschten 13:16, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
  •   Comment Indeed, thx! Changing from weak to full support! ;) --Plozessor 14:18, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
  •   Support Good to me like that. --Sebring12Hrs 16:50, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 08:07, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Tree_at_Keravanjoki_east_of_Tikkurtie.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Tree at Keravanjoki river east of Tikkurtie (Helsinki) --Plozessor 05:14, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
      Support Good quality. --XRay 08:13, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
    I rather see a tree instead of a river, which should be identified --Poco a poco 08:14, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
    @Poco a poco: Which is what the description says. But I also requested rename now. --Plozessor 09:08, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
    I saw that but in the case of a tree I'd expect the id of the tree species --Poco a poco 17:06, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
    @Poco a poco: The picture is still showing the river, and a tree at the riverbank; it's meant to illustrate Keravanjoki and its surroundings, not willow trees. ;) But I added category and updated the description (unfortunately I can't tell more than it's a willow). If you're still unhappy with that, please decline it so that I can have it moved to discussion. --Plozessor 17:16, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
      Oppose You have to make up you mind. If the subject is the tree it needs an id, if the subject is the river, then it isn't a QI to me because it is obstructed behind the trees and leaves --Poco a poco 21:47, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
  Comment The subject is the landscape along the river, after all this is in the middle of Helsinki. Or should I describe it as part of Tikkurilanranta park? "Willow tree at Keravanjoki in Tikkurilanranta park east of Tikkurtie", would that suit you? --Plozessor 05:48, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support QI to me. Why trees should have "id" while buildings, cars, planes are generaly incorrectly named ? --Sebring12Hrs 22:38, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support The description Salix seems sufficient to me.--Famberhorst 16:12, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 08:08, 3 January 2024 (UTC)