Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 25 2022

Consensual review edit

File:Port_Vendres_Redoute-Béar_(Süd).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Redoute Béar in Port-Vendres, France. --Palauenc05 16:45, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Already promoted :) --PantheraLeo1359531 17:25, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
  • @PantheraLeo1359531: No, uploaded today. The QI-template was added by mistake, it's removed now. --Palauenc05 18:57, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Comment Sorry that I have to take this to CR. The shot was taken on Jan. 16 and nominated on Jan. 19. It has never been promoted. --Palauenc05 08:21, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Really solid. -- Ikan Kekek 06:35, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:20, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Augustgeyler 22:08, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

File:20211028-_MG_9603.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Memorial JK. By User:Fwsbsb2. --Mike Peel 18:48, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Not sure, looks like wrong white balance --Nino Verde 21:27, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
  • I'd   support this image. --Hillopo2018 13:24, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Comment Quality images and contest winners have different criterias of quality --Nino Verde 16:15, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Also too bright in the bright areas and rather noisy in much of the rest of the photo. -- Ikan Kekek 10:07, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose, but not for noise. It's visible, but acceptable regarding the resolution. BUT overprocessed, red color channel massive clipping, oversaturated, and the WB seems off. --Smial 11:57, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Details are washed out.--Peulle 21:15, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Unnaturally colors. --Steindy 11:26, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose →   Declined   --Augustgeyler 22:05, 24 January 2022 (UTC)