Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 04 2022

• 
  • Nomination Groningen (city), Groningen railway station. North north west side.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:36, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Parish and pilgrimage church Our Lady in Hochfeistritz, Eberstein, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:22, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:33, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gate tower at the fortified cemetery around the parish and pilgrimage church Our Lady in Hochfeistritz, Eberstein, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:22, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chapel (formerly defense tower) at the fortification in Hochfeistritz, Eberstein, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:22, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:10, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wooden gate at the fortified cemetery around the parish and pilgrimage church Our Lady in Hochfeistritz, Eberstein, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:22, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Former elementary school at the fortification wall in Hochfeistritz #27, Eberstein, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:22, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --XRay 04:05, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Intermediate egret breeding plumage (Ardea intermedia), Kabini Reservoir, Nagarhole --Tagooty 02:08, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:24, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Old elephant with long tusks (Elephas maximus indicus) and Common Myna (Acridotheres tristis) on ground. Nagarhole Nat'l Park --Tagooty 02:08, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:24, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pallikaranai Marsh Wetland, ELCOT IT Park in the background, Greater flamingoes (Phoenicopterus roseus), Chennai, India --Tagooty 02:08, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:25, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Twin-hulled safari boat, front view, Kabini Reservoir, India --Tagooty 02:08, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:25, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sulak Canyon in Dagestan. --Alexander Novikov 20:41, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:10, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sulak Canyon in Dagestan. --Alexander Novikov 20:41, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --XRay 04:39, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ukraine, Vinnytsia. The old water tower -- George Chernilevsky 20:20, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice one. -- Ikan Kekek 21:16, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kathrin Niemela reading poetry at the poetry festival "Kooperationen" in Munich --Kritzolina 20:02, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:13, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Thomas Glatz reading poetry at the poetry festival "Kooperationen" in Munich --Kritzolina 20:02, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose not enough sharp and violet face --Ezarate 23:18, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fuchskaute, the highest mountain of the Westerwald, see from the west. --Milseburg 15:38, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek 21:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Cathedral of the Resurrection of Christ in Moscow Oblast. --Александр Мотин 14:41, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Sharp and good exposure. PC needed to reduce the backward tilt. --Tagooty 02:18, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wooden relief on a choir stall, Roskilde Cathedral, Denmark --Jakubhal 14:29, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --IamMM 15:34, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Yellowbar angelfish (Pomacanthus maculosus), Ras Muhammad National Park, Egypt --Poco a poco 14:23, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support good quality. --IamMM 15:34, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Striated surgeonfish (Ctenochaetus striatus), Ras Muhammad National Park, Egypt --Poco a poco 14:23, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --IamMM 15:34, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Giant moray (Gymnothorax javanicus), Ras Muhammad National Park, Egypt --Poco a poco 14:23, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --IamMM 15:34, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lake Walchen with Sassau Island, Bavaria, Germany --Poco a poco 14:23, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 14:30, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint-Antoine-l'Abbaye - Saint-Antoine abbey church - East façade - Exterior stoup. By User:Romainbehar. --Yann 13:43, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:18, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Заречный парк,, Кировская область. Zarechny Park, Kirov region --Ele-chudinovsk 11:59, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality: multiple issues. --Peulle 13:21, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Быковщинское озеро. Bykovshchinsky Lake in the Kirov region --Ele-chudinovsk 11:48, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline No sharpness or detail; blurred. --Peulle 13:19, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wartburg 311 convertible --Ermell 07:55, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 10:23, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Triumph GT6 MK II --Ermell 07:55, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 10:23, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination BMW 2002 --Ermell 07:55, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 10:23, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Calendula officinalis stacking. Focus stack of 10 images. --Ermell 07:55, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 08:17, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Volkswagen T1 Kombi --Ermell 07:55, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality --Palauenc05 10:21, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pointe de Nyon & Pointe d'Angolon in Morzine, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 04:19, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:13, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination RUN Thüringer Unternehmenslauf: Gunda Niemann-Stirnemann. By --Stepro 21:16, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 13:22, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lamborghini Huracan STO in Böblingen.--Alexander-93 19:00, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 13:23, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bust of Virgin Mary on the roof of a church  --Romainbehar 17:52, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Prburley 13:34, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Luttenberg-NL, catholic church --Michielverbeek 20:40, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good composition. I propose light up the dark parts a bit. But good enough for QI. --Milseburg 15:56, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gable cross of a residential/farm building in Handorf (Lower Saxony), built in 1820, view from east
    --F. Riedelio 09:57, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Milseburg 15:52, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Decoration of the left portal of the cathedral of Pisa --DnaX 21:46, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Review
    Perspective correction necessary. --Steindy 00:02, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Palatul Justiției of Brasov --DnaX 21:46, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Review It needs a perspective correction --Michielverbeek 22:11, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Jamilur Reza Choudhury. By User:Nasirkhan --RockyMasum 14:28, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment a bit noisy for QI. Possibly fixable. --MB-one 14:50, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Tune it safe! campaign car 2018 at Tuning World Bodensee 2018 --MB-one 20:57, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment The perspective is not good and the image should be a bit brighter. -- Spurzem 08:10, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Porsche-Museum in May 2022.--Alexander-93 18:33, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
    It needs a perspective correction --Poco a poco 21:23, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
     Done--Alexander-93 14:46, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
    You have now cropped the car on the left, is there a way to save it? --Poco a poco 17:03, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
    Unfortunately not.--Alexander-93 08:33, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Review needed

Consensual review

File:At_Tenerife_2020_917.jpg

• Nomination West Jupiter --Mike Peel 06:37, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose The ship is soft -- sharpening may help. The oil rig in the background is distracting. --Tagooty 03:56, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

• Thanks for the review, I've already sharpened it, not much more I can do unfortunately. Thanks. Mike Peel 19:12, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

• This picture may need more discussion --Q28 02:53, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Looks overprocessed to me, sorry.--Peulle 18:07, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:29, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Bahía_Rocosa,_San_Lawrenz,_isla_de_Gozo,_Malta,_2021-08-22,_DD_70.jpg

• Nomination Coast of San Lawrenz, Gozo Island, Malta --Poco a poco 06:30, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
• Promotion
   Oppose Even if Poco a poco will be angry with me again, but at least the upper half of the photo is completely out of focus. --Steindy 21:28, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
  "Angry again"?, look at the result of your decline in the CR section. Regarding this image I'm aware that the tower is not sharp, that's intentional, my intention was to show the dried out coral in the coast of San Lawrenz --Poco a poco 07:43, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
  :Rating removed because I'm too stupid to see it. Yes, that is also very clear in the description of the picture and it can also be clearly read in the category that you photographed the dried-up corals. Or am I mistaken? Incidentally, the lower half of the image, which was not quite sharp, would have been sufficient for this. But don't worry, I'm out of here anyway. Thank you for nothing! --Steindy 00:07, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Succeeds in its own terms. -- Ikan Kekek 07:00, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support. Possibly a little bit overexposed again, some insignificant details in the background look like clipping in the red channel to me. This does not disturb the overall impression, it is just meant as a hint. Some critics reveal a fundamental ignorance as far as optical laws are concerned. Without going into further detail here now: It is technically impossible to image a range from three meters to "infinity" pixel sharp with a high-resolution digital 35 mm camera and the 28 mm focal length used. Diffraction prevents this. Of course, you could fix the problem via focus stacking, but I think it might be a tiny bit overkill to require this procedure as mandatory for QI in common landscape photos. --Smial 11:05, 29 June 2022 (UTC) Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:27, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Tusker_Elephant_Bath1_Nagarhole_Kabini_Apr22_D72_23842.jpg

• Nomination Tusker approaches Kabini reservoir for bath (1 of 3). Elephas maximus indicus. Karnataka--Tagooty 03:10, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
• Decline
  Looks tilted and would benefit from some more contrast --Poco a poco 07:00, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
   Oppose little detail after the big crop --Charlesjsharp 09:18, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
  @Poco a poco and Charlesjsharp: Sorry, I uploaded a lowres file by mistake. Please review the new hires image. --Tagooty 14:41, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Have done. Charlesjsharp 08:27, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Done @Poco a poco: Tilt corrected, framing improved, contrast increased. Please see the new version. --Tagooty 15:00, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:26, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Safari_Vehicles_Nagarhole_ZoneA_Apr22_R16_05989.jpg

• Nomination Safari vehicles waiting for a tiger, Gopaladevaragudi Tank, Nagarhole Tiger Reserve, Karnataka, India. --Tagooty 03:10, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:19, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose not in focus or poor quality camera - see the writing on the safari vehicle --Charlesjsharp 09:20, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Looks grainy.--Peulle 18:02, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:30, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Peacock_Rear_Nagarhole_Karnataka_Apr22_D72_24185.jpg

• Nomination Peacock (Pavo cristatus) rear view. Nagarhole Nat'l Park, India --Tagooty 03:45, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
• Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:26, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
   Oppose I disagree. Not enough separation of peacock from background. --GRDN711 12:38, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment @GRDN711: True ... but to me it illustrates how a colourful, showy bird can actually blend into the forest. --Tagooty 09:03, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Support A good picture of a bird in its environment. Yann 12:30, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nothing wrong with the background GRDN711. But bird lacks definition and image is overexposed. Charlesjsharp 08:33, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

   Done @Charlesjsharp: Uploaded a new version with reduced exposure and mild sharpening. --Tagooty 04:18, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

• Thanks. Still not that keen but have struck oppose. Charlesjsharp 08:34, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:31, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Front_Left_Stephens_Church_Ooty_Jun22_A7C_02007.jpg

• Nomination Front left view, St. Stephen's Church, Ooty, India. --Tagooty 11:08, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
• Decline
  Pity! The motorcycle disturbs. --Steindy 19:55, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
   Comment Motor vehicles are part of today's scenery. --Tagooty 03:22, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
  I request other opinions, please. --Tagooty 03:05, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose  Neutral. The scooter is actually a bit annoying. But worse is the impression that the building is tipping backwards. -- Spurzem 07:35, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment @Spurzem: The road leading up to the church is steeply uphill. See this image without PC. I've applied some PC in my image to reduce the tilt effect.

@Tagooty: O.K. That picture you're showing me looks awful. But if you look with Google you will find some better images of this church. Nevertheless, I withdraw my vote. Best regards -- Spurzem (talk) 19:30, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Oppose Perspective doesn't look good to me here. --Sebring12Hrs 19:25, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
• Weak  Support. Compared to other quality images where the architecture has been forcibly verticalized to the point of absurdity, I don't think this image is too bad, although I would like to see a camera location a bit further away. The colors look natural to me, the image sharpness is satisfactory and the lighting is good. --Smial 09:42, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Commentshould correct tilt. Charlesjsharp 08:36, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Done @Charlesjsharp: Thanks for pointing this out. --Tagooty 14:48, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Oppose Yes, the motorcycle is part of today's scenery, but it disturbs to me. Not every phooto can be a QI, sorry. --Steindy 15:44, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:33, 3 July 2022 (UTC))