Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 08 2023

Consensual review edit

File:Stolperstein_Ludwigshafen_033_2023_03_10.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Stumbling block dedicated to Lore Durlacher
    --F. Riedelio 07:27, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:36, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Low resolution due to being a crop of another image. --CherryX 18:27, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Hardly over 1MP --Jakubhal 06:56, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
  •   New version New version with increased resolution. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 07:22, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 10:07, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Ok now, --Jakubhal 12:56, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --BigDom 09:51, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

File:8_Strada_Zossima_Demarat,_Bucharest_(02).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination 8 Strada Zossima Demarat, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 18:22, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:25, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Composition (tree) --CherryX 18:35, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Trees aren't problematic to me here, sharpness is good, perspective is good. --Sebring12Hrs 06:18, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --BigDom 09:44, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Northerly_Turning_Error_(Southern_Hemisphere).gif edit

 

  • Nomination I made a GIF illustrating magnetic compass errors (turning error) on airplanes. -- 20:59, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Generally well made but unfortunately below the minimum resolution. --MB-one 08:19, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
    I am under the impression that none of the animated GIFs are subject to that requirement, as the overall resolution, counted frame-by-frame, typically exceed 2 mega pixels. See existing animated QIs. -- 18:00, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Great illustration with high educational value. I don't see how rules made for phtographs could be applied to this. --Frank Schulenburg 23:40, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. ReneeWrites 09:43, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Mike Peel 18:46, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Acceleration_Error_(Northern_Hemisphere).gif edit

 

  • Nomination A GIF for another type of compass error (acceleration error) -- 20:59, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Generally well made but unfortunately below the minimum resolution. --MB-one 08:19, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
    I am under the impression that none of the animated GIFs are subject to that requirement, as the overall resolution, counted frame-by-frame, typically exceed 2 mega pixels. See existing animated QIs (I think the rule needs to be revised). -- 18:00, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Same as above. --Frank Schulenburg 23:41, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. ReneeWrites 09:43, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Mike Peel 18:46, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Sacrifize_de_Isach_Kirchebner_Urtijëi.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination 17120 in South Tyrol.English: The Sacrifice of Isaac. Fresco by Franz Xaver Kirchebner in the Parish Church of Urtijëi. --Moroder 13:09, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose It seems to have camera shakes and stitching issues, sorry --PantheraLeo1359531 13:45, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
  • I disagree --Moroder 14:03, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose It is like two images with completely different qualities. On the right, the level of detail is great. On the left, the image is blurred, visible mostly on the angel in the center. Still, considering the resolution, it could be acceptable. However, there is also a long yellowish line, exactly in the middle, extending from the top to the middle of the image. It's not present in the older pictures. I think it looks too regular for a leak, so I assume it is a stitching error. -- Jakubhal 11:18, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  Comment It's not a stitching error but a shadow from the suspension of a hanging light --Moroder 18:05, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:43, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Fosna_Multi_in_Krossfjorden_05.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Fosna Multi in Krossfjorden, Austevoll. --Vasmar1 14:19, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:19, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Appears under-exposed and does not show workboat well. --GRDN711 20:49, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per GRDN711 --Sandro Halank 12:50, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Cloudy weather, but there is absolutely nothing underexposed. --Smial 11:54, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per GRDN711, sorry. --Tournasol7 15:16, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Mike Peel 18:44, 7 July 2023 (UTC)