Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 22 2022

Consensual review edit

File:Graney_class_SSN_885M_variant.svg edit

 

  Support I find the quality of this silhouette is similar to several SVG of submarines that have been promoted as QI. The 3 images are sufficiently different that each would have taken similar effort to taking a QI photo with a camera. Per Watchduck, the oppose votes are unjustified. --Tagooty 10:37, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support per Tagooty.--Ermell 13:56, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support @Mike1979 Russia: Please, do not get demotivated! --Mosbatho 20:19, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support per others. --MB-one 20:27, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support --GRDN711 02:07, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Too bad part of a mast is cut off in this one. How come? But still quite good. -- Ikan Kekek 03:03, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --MB-one 16:43, 20 July 2022 (UTC)