Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 23 2022

Consensual review edit

File:Mănăstirea Lainici (by Pudelek).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Church of the Presentation of Mary, Lainici monastery, Romania --Pudelek 11:51, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Unfavorable cropping (disturbing element at the right edge of the image), fixable? --F. Riedelio 07:15, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality, geocoding would be nice. --Palauenc05 16:22, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
I withdraw my support as there is no reaction to my request. --Palauenc05 12:07, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
@Palauenc05: I added geocoding, it was fairly easy to find by Google Maps. Thanks. Mike Peel 17:35, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality, and I think the right crop is acceptable because any crop on that side will involve some kind of choice. This crop is just to the right of a shrub. A bit further left could be just to the right of the flowers. Further left could crop out the building on the right but would bisect the flowers. And there's also the question of how much room you want on both sides of the church and how much of the forested hill you want. All in all, this isn't FPC, so let's give a good photo of a good motif some latitude on the crop. -- Ikan Kekek 10:02, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
  •   Comment As far as cropping is concerned, I'm right there with Ikan. But is it possible that the perspective correction was a bit too strong? The column at the bottom left and the column by the building on the right and the vertical edges on the low outbuilding on the left seem to me to tilt slightly outwards. But that could also be due to a barrel distortion of the lens. --Smial 10:38, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
    •   Oppose Even after a week no reaction, no objections, no explanation of the described shortcomings and also no image revision, therefore oppose. --Smial 16:07, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
  •   Comment. That's my impression too. The pillars are vertical, but the building looks as if it would tilt to the left. -- Spurzem 18:07, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Looks good to me. Thanks. Mike Peel 17:35, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support OK for me.--Rjcastillo 02:03, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:19, 22 July 2022 (UTC)