Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 25 2022

Consensual review edit

File:Hong_Kong_Island_Skyline_2009.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Skyline of Central, filmed on 2009-06-20. By User:WiNG --Q28 08:21, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
    QI requires an accurate image description which is missing here. GPS coordinates would also be helpful. --GRDN711 16:19, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
    I updated the image description. --Steven Sun 14:43, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Support. --GRDN711 14:17, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Regarding the low resolution, I expect more sharpness and less noise. --Milseburg 18:25, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Milseburg. Had this photo been nominated in 2009, it might have passed, but even then, there were sharper cityscape photos. -- Ikan Kekek 05:04, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per others. Less than 3 MPixels from a 12 MPixels camera. I don't mind a certain amount of downscaling, but this is too much and it has lost too much detail. Composition and lighting are nice. --Smial 07:46, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Smial --Jakubhal 09:51, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:19, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Moltinden_behind_Fredvang_in_Flakstad,_Nordland,_Norway,_2022_June.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Moltinden behind Fredvang village, Norway --Ximonic 13:49, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Beautiful but out of focus --Romainbehar 18:12, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Looks good to me on my 23.5-inch monitor. -- Ikan Kekek 03:24, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Looks sharp also for me --Jakubhal 06:05, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Noise reduction somewhat overdone, some burnt highlights (the boats), but overall, however, it is in any case a QI. Very nice lighting and composition. --Smial 10:34, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
  •   Comment I would be curious what is meant by out of focus, as I don't really find a very bad focus area in the mountains or houses, so that I could do better. I now agree that some details may be lessened in shadows, but it's not from noise reduction (which I barely did), but probably because the camera captures less detail from dark areas. I should have done in HDR, I now think. --Ximonic 12:03, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
    • These areas in the shadows are very difficult to capture. To me, they look pretty natural. Kodachrome 25 would not really have made it better. ;-) I would never ask for exposure bracketing with tone mapping/hdr for QIC when it comes to landscape photography. --Smial 15:01, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
      • I'm sure you'll have to change the tactics with Kodachrome for sure. :-D --Ximonic (talk) 11:51, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Good sharpness. --Milseburg 13:08, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:20, 24 July 2022 (UTC)