Wikimedia Commons

Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 19 2022

< Commons:Quality images candidates
  • * Nomination Ketelmeerdijk, art of Corten steel on the dike near the Ketelhaven. --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 17 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:34, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Ketelmeerdijk, art of Corten steel on the dike near the Ketelhaven.
      --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:34, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Houtribsluizen, historical landmark (urb Bootjes) at the Houtribsluizen. --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 17 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:34, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Houtribsluizen, historical landmark (urb Bootjes) at the Houtribsluizen.
      --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:34, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Kings Creek Falls Trail in Lassen Volcanic National Park, California --Frank Schulenburg 02:52, 17 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:12, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Kings Creek Falls Trail in Lassen Volcanic National Park, California --Frank Schulenburg 02:52, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --XRay 04:12, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Staircase to the organ gallery at the parish and monastery church Assumption of Mary in Ossiach #1, Ossiach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:23, 17 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 02:52, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Staircase to the organ gallery at the parish and monastery church Assumption of Mary in Ossiach #1, Ossiach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:23, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 02:52, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Cemetery with parish and monastery church Assumption of Mary in Ossiach #1, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:23, 17 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 02:52, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Cemetery with parish and monastery church Assumption of Mary in Ossiach #1, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:23, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 02:52, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Plaque at the assumed tomb of Boleslav II of Poland at the exterior north wall of the parish and monastery church Assumption of Mary in Ossiach #1, Ossiach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:23, 17 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 02:52, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Plaque at the assumed tomb of Boleslav II of Poland at the exterior north wall of the parish and monastery church Assumption of Mary in Ossiach #1, Ossiach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:23, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 02:52, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Staircase to the organ gallery at the parish and monastery church Assumption of Mary in Ossiach #1, Ossiach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:23, 17 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 02:52, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Staircase to the organ gallery at the parish and monastery church Assumption of Mary in Ossiach #1, Ossiach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:23, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 02:52, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Fountain at the park in Ossiach, Ossiach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:23, 17 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:12, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Fountain at the park in Ossiach, Ossiach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:23, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --XRay 04:12, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Stork's nest in Vorra (Frensdorf) --Ermell 21:35, 16 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 01:43, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Stork's nest in Vorra (Frensdorf) --Ermell 21:35, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 01:43, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Wilhelm Schwarz & Co. Reinforcing steel mesh in Schlüsselfeld --Ermell 21:35, 16 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Wilhelm Schwarz & Co. Reinforcing steel mesh in Schlüsselfeld --Ermell 21:35, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Stork's nest in Vorra (Frensdorf) --Ermell 21:35, 16 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 01:44, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Stork's nest in Vorra (Frensdorf) --Ermell 21:35, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 01:44, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Volkswagen Polo VI GTI (Facelift) in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 15:56, 16 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:38, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Volkswagen Polo VI GTI (Facelift) in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 15:56, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:38, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination European Central Bank at Frankfurt, Germany -- Der Wolf im Wald 12:18, 16 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:36, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination European Central Bank at Frankfurt, Germany -- Der Wolf im Wald 12:18, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:36, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Repairs of Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye church, June 2022. --Yann 11:49, 16 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion Perhaps a left crop for better balance might be considered but otherwise good quality. --Peulle 11:59, 16 June 2022 (UTC) Done, but please note the sculpture is not really symmetric. Yann 12:25, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Repairs of Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye church, June 2022. --Yann 11:49, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion Perhaps a left crop for better balance might be considered but otherwise good quality. --Peulle 11:59, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
      Done, but please note the sculpture is not really symmetric. Yann 12:25, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Agiou Georgiou square, Kypseli, Athens. --C messier 09:42, 16 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:36, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Agiou Georgiou square, Kypseli, Athens. --C messier 09:42, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:36, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Isaias Mansion, Athens. --C messier 09:42, 16 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 17:15, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Isaias Mansion, Athens. --C messier 09:42, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 17:15, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Caterpillar of Loxura atymnus (Stoll, 1780) – Yamfly on Smilax zeylanica. (by Bias Chakraborty) --Atudu 09:03, 16 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:38, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Caterpillar of Loxura atymnus (Stoll, 1780) – Yamfly on Smilax zeylanica. (by Bias Chakraborty) --Atudu 09:03, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:38, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Caterpillar of Curetis thetis (Drury, 1773) – Indian Sunbeam on Pongamia pinnata.(by Bias Chakraborty) --Atudu 08:56, 16 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:38, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Caterpillar of Curetis thetis (Drury, 1773) – Indian Sunbeam on Pongamia pinnata.(by Bias Chakraborty) --Atudu 08:56, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:38, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Red mullet (Mullus barbatus), Teno-Rasca marine strip, Tenerife, Spain --Poco a poco 07:19, 16 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:21, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Red mullet (Mullus barbatus), Teno-Rasca marine strip, Tenerife, Spain --Poco a poco 07:19, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:21, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Common cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis), Teno-Rasca marine strip, Tenerife, Spain --Poco a poco 07:19, 16 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:21, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Common cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis), Teno-Rasca marine strip, Tenerife, Spain --Poco a poco 07:19, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:21, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination School of bastard grunts (Pomadasys incisus), Teno-Rasca marine strip, Tenerife, Spain --Poco a poco 07:19, 16 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:21, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination School of bastard grunts (Pomadasys incisus), Teno-Rasca marine strip, Tenerife, Spain --Poco a poco 07:19, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:21, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Moray eels (Muraena augusti), Teno-Rasca marine strip, Tenerife, Spain --Poco a poco 07:19, 16 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:21, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Moray eels (Muraena augusti), Teno-Rasca marine strip, Tenerife, Spain --Poco a poco 07:19, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:21, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination AIDAnova at the Port of Santa Cruz de Tenerife --Mike Peel 06:37, 16 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality and good view -- Spurzem 06:56, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination AIDAnova at the Port of Santa Cruz de Tenerife --Mike Peel 06:37, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality and good view -- Spurzem 06:56, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Bentago Express reversing into a berth --Mike Peel 06:37, 16 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:23, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Bentago Express reversing into a berth --Mike Peel 06:37, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:23, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Liverpool Lime Street station --Mike Peel 06:37, 16 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:23, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Liverpool Lime Street station --Mike Peel 06:37, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:23, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Entrance to the Making of Harry Potter studios --Mike Peel 06:37, 16 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:22, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Entrance to the Making of Harry Potter studios --Mike Peel 06:37, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:22, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Shell of a Wrinkled cowry, Nucleolaria nucleus --Llez 04:37, 16 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality and more interesting than the current FPCs --Poco a poco 07:22, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Shell of a Wrinkled cowry, Nucleolaria nucleus --Llez 04:37, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality and more interesting than the current FPCs --Poco a poco 07:22, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination M24 Chaffee, Spicheren, France --Llez 04:37, 16 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:11, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination M24 Chaffee, Spicheren, France --Llez 04:37, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:11, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination M24 Chaffee, Spicheren, France --Llez 04:37, 16 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:22, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination M24 Chaffee, Spicheren, France --Llez 04:37, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:22, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Rene Pauritsch, manager of Liechtensten football team. --Steindy 00:05, 16 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:24, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Rene Pauritsch, manager of Liechtensten football team. --Steindy 00:05, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:24, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination BMW 220i Active Tourer on display in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 16:21, 15 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:35, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination BMW 220i Active Tourer on display in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 16:21, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:35, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Central mountain massif of Flakstadøya behind Bjønnvatnet, Nordland, Norway --Ximonic 15:25, 15 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:35, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Central mountain massif of Flakstadøya behind Bjønnvatnet, Nordland, Norway --Ximonic 15:25, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:35, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Mercedes-Benz EQS 450+ on display in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 12:08, 15 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:35, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Mercedes-Benz EQS 450+ on display in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 12:08, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:35, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Bogue (Boops boops), Teno-Rasca marine strip, Tenerife, Spain --Poco a poco 09:41, 15 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion Not sure, but looks like there is a purple cast all over the photo. --C messier 12:32, 15 June 2022 (UTC) You're right, I adjusted the WB --Poco a poco 07:36, 16 June 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 09:44, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Bogue (Boops boops), Teno-Rasca marine strip, Tenerife, Spain --Poco a poco 09:41, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
      Not sure, but looks like there is a purple cast all over the photo. --C messier 12:32, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
      You're right, I adjusted the WB --Poco a poco 07:36, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
       Support Good quality. --C messier 09:44, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Mura di San niccolo --Wikibusters 08:46, 15 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion The file is tilted and/or needs a perspective correction, the right side is leaning out. And please, reduce the file size, it is ridiculously big for an image of this resolution --Poco a poco 11:23, 15 June 2022 (UTC) Better? Thank you --Wikibusters 15:09, 15 June 2022 (UTC)  Support Indeed --Poco a poco 07:26, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Mura di San niccolo --Wikibusters 08:46, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
      The file is tilted and/or needs a perspective correction, the right side is leaning out. And please, reduce the file size, it is ridiculously big for an image of this resolution --Poco a poco 11:23, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
      Better? Thank you --Wikibusters 15:09, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
       Support Indeed --Poco a poco 07:26, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination The players of the Austrian national team thank the spectators for their support. --Steindy 00:05, 15 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:35, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination The players of the Austrian national team thank the spectators for their support. --Steindy 00:05, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:35, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Sea star (Astropecten platyacanthus), St. Elmo Bay, Valletta, Malta --Poco a poco 10:18, 14 June 2022 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose Extremely noisy top left. --C messier 19:25, 14 June 2022 (UTC) Agree,  new version uploaded Poco a poco 11:35, 15 June 2022 (UTC)  Comment It looks very soft now (and also has a watermark). I don't think it is salvageable, given the small size of the photo. --C messier 12:30, 15 June 2022 (UTC) Sorry for that, I exported it now with the right settings --Poco a poco 07:33, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Sea star (Astropecten platyacanthus), St. Elmo Bay, Valletta, Malta --Poco a poco 10:18, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Decline
       Oppose Extremely noisy top left. --C messier 19:25, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
      Agree, ✓ new version uploaded Poco a poco 11:35, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
       Comment It looks very soft now (and also has a watermark). I don't think it is salvageable, given the small size of the photo. --C messier 12:30, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
      Sorry for that, I exported it now with the right settings --Poco a poco 07:33, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Benin bronzes at the Horniman Museum --Mike Peel 06:34, 13 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Kritzolina 15:29, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Benin bronzes at the Horniman Museum --Mike Peel 06:34, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Kritzolina 15:29, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Benin bronzes at the Horniman Museum --Mike Peel 06:34, 13 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Kritzolina 15:29, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Benin bronzes at the Horniman Museum --Mike Peel 06:34, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Kritzolina 15:29, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination: Stone statue of Añaterve, Candelaria --Mike Peel 18:49, 10 June 2022 (UTC) * * Review needed
    • Nomination: Stone statue of Añaterve, Candelaria --Mike Peel 18:49, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Review needed
  • * Nomination: Stone statue of Tegueste, Candelaria --Mike Peel 18:49, 10 June 2022 (UTC) * * Review needed
    • Nomination: Stone statue of Tegueste, Candelaria --Mike Peel 18:49, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Review needed
  • * Nomination Social weaver nest --Mike Peel 06:38, 9 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Ok. --C messier 09:54, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Social weaver nest --Mike Peel 06:38, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Ok. --C messier 09:54, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Mumbai skyline at night by Donvikro --UnpetitproleX 20:33, 1 June 2022 (UTC) * Promotion The image is tilted clockwise, but it would be an easy fix. Maybe additional sharpening can be tried. Greetings, --Dirtsc 13:32, 7 June 2022 (UTC) @Dirtsc: Fixed --UnpetitproleX 07:04, 15 June 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --Dirtsc 08:40, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Nomination Mumbai skyline at night by Donvikro --UnpetitproleX 20:33, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Promotion The image is tilted clockwise, but it would be an easy fix. Maybe additional sharpening can be tried. Greetings, --Dirtsc 13:32, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
      @Dirtsc: Fixed --UnpetitproleX 07:04, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
       Support Good quality now. --Dirtsc 08:40, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Consensual review edit

File:Volkswagen_Golf_VIII_GTE_1X7A0306.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Volkswagen Golf VIII GTE in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 17:09, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Overall, the picture is very pale, the windshield of the VW is partially completely bleached out. -- Spurzem 17:32, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support I disagree. --MB-one 19:41, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support As do I. Looking at the other cars in the background, there doesn't seem to be a white balance issue, and we're seeing photos with worse lighting and sharpness than this being promoted daily.--Peulle 10:43, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
@Peulle: As I said in other connection, the quality requirements have apparently fallen to a very low level. Do you remember not long ago how you rated photos that I presented? This Jaguar E Type, for example, failed you because it was said to be too blurry. Please compare this photo with the VW Golf currently under discussion. Look especially to the windshield. Best regards -- Spurzem 13:41, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Indeed, I adjust my review "settings" to the community's feedback, and that determines the standard. I don't have a problem adjusting my standards if other reviewers find mine too strict, and that is what has happened here. Looking at many of the photos in QIC and CR at the moment, lots of them pass even though they are of lower quality than this one. --Peulle 18:12, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:18, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Дверь_2.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Дверь, Служебный корпус у Передних ворот --Ulaisaeva 10:54, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Lacking in detail. --Peulle 11:23, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support IMHO, it is detailed enough. But the category doors must get more specific and geocoding would be welcomed. --C messier 19:22, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The shadows, which seem to come from a tree, are very annoying. Therefore it is not a quality picture for me. But the demands here have generally become so low that the photo can perhaps be awarded. -- Spurzem (talk)
      Comment The harsh direct sunlight isn't usually the best. --C messier 09:53, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Good enough, IMO. No harsh shadows to me. -- Ikan Kekek 19:34, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Unusual but not too bad.--Ermell 20:28, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:19, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

File:AUT_vs._LIE_2015-10-12_(099).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Marko Arnautović, footballplayer of Austria. --Steindy 21:21, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Too unsharp (the eye looks out of focus) --C messier 16:00, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
  • I disagree. I think not. The player is in motion. --Steindy 00:02, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per C messier. The focus is somewhere on the tatoos, not in the player's face. --Smial 08:03, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Weak   Support. I can image that the weak sharpness is due to high ISO. Further it probably is a cut out of a higher size photo. -- Spurzem 18:20, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sharpness is definitely below the threshold even for this kind of sport photography, not the best among Steindy's works --Poco a poco 07:53, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 18:24, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Spatschlucht_Schriesheim_20220507_04.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Spatschlucht near Schriesheim, Germany --Domob 07:02, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
      Oppose No clear subject --Iosonosempreio 09:09, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
      Comment I disagree, the subject is the canyon, i.e. the upper edge and how it sits within the forest area (as per the image description). Please discuss. --Domob 17:35, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Weak   Support Maybe a little oversaturated, but certainly good enough overall. I am a little unsure about the colour reproduction, I would have expected a slightly greener overall impression in the shadow areas. But if the lighting was not through green leaves but through a piece of blue sky, the slight blue cast again fits quite well. --Smial 08:35, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support The subject is the landscape. I'm not sure why that's hard to understand; when you look at landscape paintings, does it bother you if a single tree or whatever is not featured within it? Anyway, good quality to my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek 14:51, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The photo looks kind of blurry to me. The large area of rock on the right is not sharp.--Steindy 19:12, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
You are confusing low local contrast with blur. --Smial 23:45, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support per Smial. --C messier 12:36, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Overall good. --Dirtsc 08:43, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 18:24, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Internationalists_Park_SPB_(img1).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Internationalists Park in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 06:58, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Too much foreground for me. --Steindy 18:05, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
  •   Comment Unsure if the masts on the right are actually crooked or if a little perspective correction would be needed. Otherwise I think the photo is good enough for QI. --Smial 08:51, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
    • @Smial: According to the buildings on the backgroung, perspective is okay. The masts are crooked indeed. And these granite slabs in the foreground are just an artistic trick. --Florstein 08:04, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
      • Ok, then   Support. I looked at the buildings in the background, of course, which is exactly why I was unsure ;-) --Smial 08:16, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Good enough for me. -- Ikan Kekek 19:38, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:21, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

File:At_Tenerife_2020_977.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Nanotec and Enclave del Hogar Gomero --Mike Peel 08:38, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Question What is the subject? I find the placement to be unusual --Aismallard 22:42, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
  • @Aismallard: Both buildings were the subject The aim was the juxtaposition of new (in foreground) and old (in background). Thanks. Mike Peel 06:30, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose good image idea, though it would be better to put the old building not exactly in the middle. But: CA, perspective issue, lacks any image description, rather meaningless file name (which is usually not a big problem for me, but in this combination it is the cherry on the cake). --Smial 06:42, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Not sharp enough, and agreed that the modern building is too slanted. -- Ikan Kekek 15:52, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
    • @Smial and Ikan Kekek: Thanks for the reviews. I meant to upload a modified version with the CA and perspective corrected - now done. Also a description added. I'll have another go at this photo at some point with a better lens, though, hope to improve the angle and sharpness. Thanks. Mike Peel 06:35, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The new version is an improvement but the house in the back is definitely not sharp and the composition looks arbitrary Poco a poco 07:51, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 18:23, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Quality_images_candidates/Archives_June_19_2022&oldid=666328695"