Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 19 2022

Consensual review edit

File:FC_Admira_Wacker_Mödling_vs._LASK_Linz_2018-08-12_(062).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Samuel Tetteh, player of LASK Linz. --Steindy 00:03, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
      Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:04, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
  • I'm not sure if it's a huge problem, but I'd like to hear what others say about that background. Isn't it blown?--Peulle 13:38, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose It's not so much the background but even details of the face are lost. --MB-one 13:47, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
  Question @MB-one: What details? Eyes, nose, forehead, beard, hair? I think everything is there, even the beads of sweat. --Steindy 14:23, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Details OK, background unimportant. --Palauenc05 23:01, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 09:53, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

File:Common_Hawk-cuckoo_in_Jalalpur,_Patiala_district_01.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Common Hawk-cuckoo in Jalalpur, Patiala district. --Satdeep Gill 13:35, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:46, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose too soft for me, let's have another opinion --Charlesjsharp 16:26, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Agreed, too soft for QI. --Aismallard 16:02, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose   chromatic aberration on the wire   --F. Riedelio 11:01, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 09:52, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

File:Ashy_prinia_in_Nasirpur,_Patiala.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Ashy prinia in Nasirpur, Patiala. --Satdeep Gill 13:35, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
      Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:46, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
    ISO4000 hasn't resulted in a well-defined image --Charlesjsharp 16:28, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose noisy, low quality and resolution. --Milseburg 17:49, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek 05:31, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Agreed, too noisy. --Aismallard 16:01, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 09:52, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

File:Sunset_Hillview_Cheruthony_Kerala_Mar22_A7C_01216.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Sunset from Hillview Park, Cheruthony, Kerala --Tagooty 08:37, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Sorry! The black shadow area consists only of a black area and is not drawn through at all. --Steindy 13:20, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Looks ok to me. --Imehling 13:54, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
  •   Weak support leans towards underexposed but still good enough for QI for me --Virtual-Pano 00:39, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
  •   Thank you. I've uploaded a new version with a slight increase in the exposure. --Tagooty 03:01, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support There are a lot of sunset photos, but this one is good overall ! --Sebring12Hrs 10:31, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The clouds in the upper part are quite noisy   --F. Riedelio 10:59, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 09:52, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

File:FC_Admira_Wacker_Mödling_vs._LASK_Linz_2018-08-12_(058).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Christian Ramsebner, player of LASK Linz. --Steindy 00:03, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Eyes and one side of face in deep shadow. Fixable? --Tagooty 03:04, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
      Support Good quality. --XRay 04:37, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
      Oppose Eyes and one side of face in deep shadow. --Tagooty 09:38, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Shadow is OK to me. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 05:32, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support As this is a picture of a moving football player and not a portrait I don't mind the shadow. --Imehling 06:31, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support Support per others --Aismallard 16:00, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 09:51, 18 March 2022 (UTC)