Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 08 2022

Consensual review edit

File:Convento_de_Cristo_-_Storage_Room_-_1.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Storage Room in Convento de Cristo / Tomar, Portugal --Imehling 09:23, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 18:19, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry, but except the column in the middle, eveything is unsharp and grainy. --Palauenc05 11:06, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The details are lacking, even on the column.--Peulle 09:45, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 08:36, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

File:001_2022_04_09_Ei.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Egg in high-key photographic composition
    --F. Riedelio 09:10, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • I'm seeing lots of artefacts. Is it just me on my computer or do others see the same?--Peulle 11:23, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
  • I also see a lot of compression artefacts. The clean white background is nice, but a white object on a white background is not a good choice for contrast. A slight grey would probably fit much better --Hangman'sDeath 12:55, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
  •   New version Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 08:53, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support This version is OK to my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek 05:33, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
  •   Neutral. I will not decline. But there is not enough contrast. That's nearly like a black cat in the dark cellar without light. -- Spurzem 10:51, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
  •   Comment This is high-key photography where bright tones, soft lighting and low contrasts predominate. --F. Riedelio 06:27, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
  •   Support The photo is very well done, even if I would have preferred a slightly different aspect ratio. It is a little too narrow for me. I don't like the naming convention in the file name. I think the designation of the object belongs in front, the order or sorting identification of the photographer in the back. For example, I would have named it "Chicken Egg Highkey <ident code>". --Smial 09:30, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 08:33, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]