Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 02 2019

Consensual review edit

File:Тхір_лісовий.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Mustela putorius in Ukraine by User:Byrdyak --Anntinomy 11:00, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose The whole animal should be sharp. -- Spurzem 14:23, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
    Head and eyes are sharp which is enough IMO --Ermell 21:13, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
@Ermell: I would also see it that way if the head were the essential part of the picture. But it does not yet fill five percent of the image. -- Spurzem 09:25, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Sufficient for animal portrait. --Axel 06:43, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Spurzem --GRDN711 13:25, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support per Axel. Very nice lighting and composition. --Smial 15:37, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support I believe, as portraits go, this one is fine. Low DOF here helps to emphasize the central area of interest - the face of the animal. Stoxastikos 17:50, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --Seven Pandas 02:18, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Mannersdorf_Rochusberg_20.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Objekt auf dem Rochusberg in Mannersdorf an der March (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 05:10, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion   Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:16, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree. Sky again. --Tsungam 07:47, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Done
    Edited with other software and uploaded new version. --Manfred Kuzel 08:36, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
      Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:35, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Seven Pandas 02:17, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Rastede,_Denkmal_Nikolaus_Friedrich_Peter,_2019-10_CN-01.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Memorial to Peter II, Grand Duke of Oldenburg, in Rastede --Carschten 08:32, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Insufficient quality. That window is pretty disturbing, sorry --Moroder 08:48, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support I disagree. What can the photographer change? The window is there and can not be cast off. Good quality. --Steindy 10:03, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment Composition is an important prerequisite imo for QIC so he could simply crop it --Moroder 12:00, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry, but I have to agree with Moroder, the window is very distracting. --EV Raudtee 12:19, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment First I see the window and not the memorial. The image could be tighter cropped and it would be good. -- Spurzem 13:20, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support - I like the composition with the window. -- Ikan Kekek 18:19, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Mich stört das Fenster nicht. Commons-Fotografen sollten nur mit Flex, Kettensäge und Sprengstoff losziehen, um störende Dinge aus den Motiven zu entfernen ;) --Ralf Roletschek 19:34, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
+1! --Steindy 21:11, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --Seven Pandas 02:17, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Chiesa_di_San_Gaetano_San_Gaetano_riceve_il_Bambino_Brescia.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Saint Cajetan recieving Christ Child from the Virgin by Filippo Maria Galletti --Moroder 07:56, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --EV Raudtee 12:31, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment There is a white edge in the lower left corner from perspective correction. --Berthold Werner 13:54, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Done Thanks for the hint --Moroder 14:04, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Good now --Berthold Werner 08:26, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support - Looks good to me. -- Ikan Kekek 18:20, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Seven Pandas 02:16, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

File:2018-08-07_World_Rowing_Junior_Championships_(Opening_Ceremony)_by_Sandro_Halank–147.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Opening Ceremony at the 2018 World Rowing Junior Championships in Račice u Štětí. Risu Rii. By User:Sandro Halank --Andrew J.Kurbiko 00:34, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose is it just me or the background looks kinda blurry? --Masumrezarock100 01:03, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support I'm confused. Of course the background is blurry; the focus is on the athlete.--Peulle 07:46, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
  • A   Question though: what do we think of the cut-off flag?--Peulle 11:45, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Weak support quality is ok, but composition not that good. --EV Raudtee 12:11, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose As a portrait not sharp enough, as a documentation of the ceremony too bad composition (cropped flag). Background somewhat overexposed. --Smial 12:56, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Smial --GRDN711 17:48, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Yes, I think I agree. No problem with the background, though.--Peulle 08:10, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry! The sportsman is not sharp, cropped flag. --Steindy 01:21, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose →   Declined   --Seven Pandas 02:15, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Gmunden_Gisela_Dampfmaschine_von_1870-2695.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination The steam eingine of paddle steamer "Gisela" --Isiwal 14:49, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Interesting but too noisy --Poco a poco 18:34, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
    Probably a bit too aggresive noise reduction, but ok,   Support now Poco a poco 07:52, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment The noise can be reduced. I have a new version with noise reduction uploaded and IMO the quality is good for QI. --Steindy 21:01, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Blurred, surface structures completely destroyed. Lots of sharpening artifacts. --Smial 08:28, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support OK 4 me. --Palauenc05 07:36, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support --Steindy 18:21, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose As per Smial.--Tobias ToMar Maier 11:10, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --Seven Pandas 02:13, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Біля_Несамовитого.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Nesamovyte lake. By User:Vian --Andrew J.Kurbiko 07:10, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Nice picture, but the colors seems not natural. --Tournasol7 11:49, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
      Info Compare with Nesamovyte_osero.JPG or the category. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 12:38, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose overprocessed. Seven Pandas 21:47, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Weak support Could be less saturated, but imho still OK for QI. --A.Savin 11:49, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support per A.Savin. --Smial 10:15, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support per above. --EV Raudtee 11:55, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --Seven Pandas 02:12, 2 November 2019 (UTC)