Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 02 2023

Consensual review edit

File:Mt._Parnassus.jpg edit

 

File:Bolzplatz,_Rendsburg_(LRM_20200411_121356).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Closed-off football field during the Covid-19 pandemic in Rendsburg --MB-one 18:07, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Low detail, massive NR applied --Plozessor 18:05, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Maybe too strong NR, but still enough fine detail. Please discuss. --C messier 15:54, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
  •   Comment @Plozessor: Thanks for the review. I revised the NR. Hope it's better now. --MB-one 11:04, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Now it's good! --Plozessor 12:33, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
  •   Comment Looks good. Maybe the sky color is a bit unusual? -- Ikan Kekek 06:53, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:42, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Koleje_Dolnoslaskie,_Zgorzelec_(LRM_20220308_125037).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination 45WE and 31WE of Koleje Dolnoslaskie at Zgorzelec station --MB-one 10:03, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
      Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 12:22, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
      Oppose I disagree. Digital displays not readable. --Smial 19:09, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
      Support Technical quality is fine (minimal colour noise in the shadows, can be improved but ok for QI). Digital dispalys is not readable, but It's not the photographer's fault.--ArildV 07:40, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Good for a smartphone photo. Unfair IMO to criticise the photographer for the way LED displays work. BigDom 14:58, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support per BigDom --Plozessor 15:06, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support per BigDom and ArildV. -- Ikan Kekek 06:55, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
  •   Comment I find it a bit... strange to accuse people of unfairness when criticising an obvious technical flaw. You can photograph such displays legibly. File:Unna Bahnhofsbereich neuer Busbahnhof Infosaeule IMGP7240 wp.jpg --Smial 21:39, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:41, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Church_of_Our_Lady_of_Grace_Hoboken_November_2021.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Church of Our Lady of Grace, Hoboken. --King of Hearts 07:57, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:19, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose. I see very disburbing shadows so that it is no QI for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 11:18, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Catch-22 for the photographer I suppose. To get nice light from this direction, the building they are standing on is obviously going to cast some shade, but the shadow doesn't encroach onto the church itself, which is well captured IMO. BigDom 15:04, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality, and the shadows don't disturb me. -- Ikan Kekek 06:57, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:41, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Calle_Redin_in_Pamplona_(4).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Calle Redín – historic old town of Pamplona, Navarre, Spain. --Tournasol7 04:09, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
  • Too dark. --Plozessor 04:22, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
  • It was very cloudy day, it was dark in reality.--Tournasol7 13:39, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support. In my opinion the fact that it was a dark, cloudy day is no excuse for presenting a photo that is too dark. ;-) But with a little, hopefully permissible, editing, the image can be made more friendly. Now I think it's perfect: very good composition, perfect sharpness and pleasant colors. What more are we asking for a QI? -- Spurzem 18:27, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Yes, new version is good! --Plozessor 18:32, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality with better lighting for this new version. --Giles Laurent 21:56, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek 06:59, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:40, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Calle_Dormitaleria_in_Pamplona_(2).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Calle Dormitalería in Pamplona, Navarre, Spain. --Tournasol7 04:09, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Too dark. --Plozessor 04:22, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
  • It was very cloudy day, it was dark in reality.--Tournasol7 13:39, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support. In the meantime it seems to have cleared up a bit and the dark alley is brighter. Good and beautiful picture as I think -- Spurzem 18:43, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Yes, new version is good. --Plozessor 05:32, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Good. I think the original version was also OK. -- Ikan Kekek 07:01, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:39, 1 November 2023 (UTC)